Cheers Dh,I didn’t realise so much engine stuff had been re-used. 🙂
I agree with all of the above ‘comfy sweater’statements-it’s a great movie and one that alot of non-aviation people seem to enjoy as well as us ‘nutters’.I don’t really care about the particular Mk’s of Spit or whatever,it was an incredible achievement to make the movie a reality.It was the most expensive movie ever made up to that time!However…
“Four blade propellers on flying Spitfires?. Well yes – but only visible on the stills or ‘freeze frame’. The principal close up ground/taxi/shut down shots used two Mk XVI aircraft, SM411 and TB382, both re-fitted with three blade props for the filming.
Mark”
…To show just how many times I’ve watched this film (and to show how incredably sad I am!),I can prove that the above statement is incorrect.If you watch the bit about a 3rd of the way through the film (just after the Stuka massacre) there’s a a scramble scene where the chap on the dispersal phone shouts ‘Two Section scramble!’ (even though the Flights were denoted by colours rather than numbers!).During that scene,as the spits start up,there’s a Spit with a four blade prop firing up. I promise you it’s there.
Now,if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to get a life…:D
As I understand it,certain small parts from the first Blenhiem were used in the restoration of the second,such as a wing flap,navigator’s seat etc,although nothing major.I’d not heard of any engine components being reused.
The wreck of the first is now in store at Duxford,and I’ve heard that certain bits from it have been or are going to be used in the static Bolingbroke restoration for the IWM.
I’ve got a rather tatty first edition copy of both the soft and hardback editions and the hardback certainly does have more piccies in it,perhaps twice as many.Having said that,the soft back manages to cram an awful lot in and there isn’t much between them aside from the photo’s.
Hi Tom,
I can’t help you with any details myself,but I can recommend the RAF Commands forum.I’m often amazed by the informative responses to even the most obscure queeries.
http://www.rafcommands.com/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=list&forum=DCForumID6&conf=DCConfID1
Hope they can come up with the information you’re looking for.
Ant
Nice one Paul!Many,many congratulations.:cool: 🙂
I remember an article in Flypast a few years ago which showed a picture of two immaculate Skyraiders in a hangar in Southern Vietnam along with a huge number of brand new engines stored in air tight containers.The article stated that these relics had not been snapped up on the Western market because of a trade ban imposed by the US.Has anything happenned with these since?
I agree it’s a great article in this month’s Flypast,I’ve been fan of the Spad since I saw one of Paul Bonhomme’s displays in the TFC example a few years back.I had no idea anything so big and ugly could be so capable! (No offence Paul,I’m talking about the aircraft!! :D)
Has anyone seen the movie ‘Flight of the Intruder’ or read the Stephen Koontz novel of the same name?The closing scene in the movie has some excellent scenes showing Spads covering a helo-extraction of a downed crew (I think Planes of Fame/Steve Hinton were involved in the making of these sequences).The book is great too,much better than the film on the whole.
Would love to see the TFC Hawker Nimrod and Shuttleworth Hind in formation with the Begian Fury.Hopefully Guy Black’s Fury will be up and about before too long,so perhaps that formation isn’t so fanciful!Perhaps even the Skysport Demon could make it a four ship!
Would also love to see the RNHF SeaFury with the Seafire 47 and Fairey Firefly from the US in a Korean War formation,perhaps with Tigercat/Sabre/Corsair/Invader/Skyraider formation to represent the US.
“Dez,
The Chipmunk canopy is British, but the colour scheme is Canadian – the Canadian version had bubble canopy – can anyone help with a picture.
Airbedane”
Et Voila! One Canadian Chippie…
Before we go any further,I think it’s important to point out that Richard Pearse was not the first man to achieve powered flight.It’s uncertain that he ever flew at all in fact.The claims that Pearse was the first to fly have been made by others since,and not by the man himself.These claims and rumours were already cropping up in Pearse’s lifetime,and he made extensive efforts to quash these rumours himself,writing to national newspapers and scientific periodicals etc denying claims which had been made by others on his behalf.He never claimed to have achieved controlled,powered flight himself.
As others have said Andy,many thanks for the opportunity to comment,it’s much appreciated.Again as others have said,I wouldn’t want to see much changed,OW is a brilliant venue with lots of beautiful aeroplanes that are very professionally flown.Just superb!
Having said that,there is just one thing,and it concerns one or two recent aquisitions that the collection has made.I’m just wondering why the collection recently purchased a Bucker Jungmann (with some talk in the press of adding a Jungmiester and Bestmann at some point in the future) when there are numerous British types that could do with the collection’s attention.The Jungmann is a very nice machine,but there are a number in private hands elsewhere,both here in the UK and abroad.The same cannot be said for the Supermarine Walrus or the Masefield Chipmunk as just a couple of examples.
I know the loss of the LVG means that Shuttleworth has lost it’s long-time ‘baddy’ and it’s been suggested that the Jungmann has been purchased to try and make up for this.
Any chance you could enlighten us as to the reasoning behind this recent acquisition?
“Can I have a CAC Boomerang please? (Personal wish…)”
Seconded. 🙂
Thanks Geoff,brilliant pics.I remember seeing the Harvard and insisting it was a Brewster Buffalo untill I actually read the notice in front of it-whoops :D.
I remember the Lizzie and the Spitfire VIII aswell,although some of the others are a bit of a surprise to me-I’d have thought I’d have noticed the MB Meteor and the specially marked Bucc!
Cheers for the Spit piccy Melvyn,which one was this?I remember there was a big collection of Airfix models displayed on a stall beside it.
I seem to remember there was a static MiG 21 in one of the hangars aswell,it was said to be the first of it’s type to be seen in the UK.Any ideas which one this was or what became of it??
“I have some really nice pix from the static though………………..Anyone like to see them??”
Yes please Geoff,would be mucho interestingo!I might even be in the background of some of them as I had a nosey around the static at the end of the display too.
My sister lives in Abingdon and it was only walking distance from her place to the airfield,so thnakfully we didn’t have to contend with the traffic trouble!
“The appearance of the MATS Constellation a few years ago was a departure from the percieved policy of the display, but was memorable and certainly didn’t detract from the show. “
I agree that its was great to see the Connie,but I’m not sure it was a departure from the usual policy.The Connie served in WW.2 (admittedly in limited numbers) as the C69,carrying cargo,troops and VIP’s.It’s a piston engined military transport from WW2 so therefore fits in with the Legends theme IMHO. Would love to see the Dutch Connie at Legends this year if she’s flying by then,in her short-nosed form she’s even closer to the configuration of the wartime examples.
As for stepladders I wholeheartedly agree!I might even suggest extending the charge to those with tall camera tripods,which can be as tall as a bloke on a stepladder in some cases.