dark light

BSG-75

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,746 through 2,760 (of 3,576 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Worst British aircraft of W.W.II #1221719
    BSG-75
    Participant

    Didn’t the Hampden have a fixed forward firing gun anyway?

    A bit of aggressiveness on the part of the pilot might have transformed that situation.

    Moggy

    IIRC a single fixed .303 in the nose, and while I’m happily corrected, I understand that if the Hampens left formation to engage, then they were attacked by Me-109’s as well – not an area in which I’m an expert by any means. Am not saying that the Defiant was a sound day fighter at all, but the book I mentioned certainly gave me a fresh viewpoint on the aircraft and its use.

    in reply to: Worst British aircraft of W.W.II #1221924
    BSG-75
    Participant

    Who would win a dogfight between a Defiant and a Roc?
    And would anybody care (apart from the participants).
    Moggy

    Botha gets my vote by reputation.

    The Crowood Aviation series book about the Turret Fighters gives an interesting breakdown on losses, kills etc – worth a read if you can get a copy. A flawed concept but in a few engagements, it worked. Interesting also to compare how ME-110’s shot down Hampdens on early daylight raids. Pulled up at the “one o’clock” postion and the rear gunner shot at the Hampden pilot.

    anyhow, Manchester, Battle, Roc, Skua, Buffalo all get a vote !

    in reply to: F-101A/C Voodoo #1222556
    BSG-75
    Participant

    Even the cheese and wine!
    .

    always buy Spanish wines myself ! – Good point on the entry fee though, maybe I should be a bit more European !!!

    IIRC in Chuck Yaegers biography he talked about some quite “aggressive” flying from the French against the F-86’s (F-100’s?) before they moved to Germany after France pulled out of NATO.

    in reply to: General Discussion #350246
    BSG-75
    Participant

    You mean the Titanic. The ship that sank was the sister ship. Swapped as part of the insurance swindle when the RN clobbered her in the dock. As well you know:dev2:

    I saw a “conspiracies” show where they blew away that notion, but they interviewed a guy who makes a living writing books about it.

    never let the truth get in the way of a good story……

    in reply to: March 31st 1909 #1917426
    BSG-75
    Participant

    You mean the Titanic. The ship that sank was the sister ship. Swapped as part of the insurance swindle when the RN clobbered her in the dock. As well you know:dev2:

    I saw a “conspiracies” show where they blew away that notion, but they interviewed a guy who makes a living writing books about it.

    never let the truth get in the way of a good story……

    in reply to: General Discussion #350363
    BSG-75
    Participant

    It also means Celien Dion on the radio, ALL DAY EVERY DAY:eek::eek::eek::eek:

    Still, the movie does show Kate Winsletts acting, ahem:diablo:, assetts very well something like 1 hr 16 mins in (so I’m told….):dev2:

    On a serious note, despite the long running Titanic interest, the sister ship story is interesting as well. Hospital ship, torpedoed etc etc.

    in reply to: March 31st 1909 #1917444
    BSG-75
    Participant

    It also means Celien Dion on the radio, ALL DAY EVERY DAY:eek::eek::eek::eek:

    Still, the movie does show Kate Winsletts acting, ahem:diablo:, assetts very well something like 1 hr 16 mins in (so I’m told….):dev2:

    On a serious note, despite the long running Titanic interest, the sister ship story is interesting as well. Hospital ship, torpedoed etc etc.

    in reply to: Another airworthy Lanc on the cards?!! Maybe. Possibly #1223285
    BSG-75
    Participant

    To my untrained eye, it looks like a restoration/repair, not a rebuild to fly. With the comments (and evidence) of reskinning needed, the damage done when it was mounted, lord knows what in the way of water, snow, wind – not by any means impossible I guess, but I just don’t see it there?

    Still, a restored Lancaster in any guise is a good thing – especially recalling the images of her before, IIRC in some dreadful colour schemes as well ?

    in reply to: F-101A/C Voodoo #1223453
    BSG-75
    Participant

    We English can appreciate anything with wings :D- I even have a soft spot for the Mirage III ……! and I dislike anything French !

    F-101 is a fantastic looking bird, especially the single seat variants. There is a 2 seater on display in the UK, ex battle damage training aircraft so one side is “patched” but it looks fantastic. The XF-88 is one of my favourite “what ifs” of the day as well.

    A real Cold war warrior the F-101, F-100 & F-105 all wonderful aircraft of the time. There is an F-105 at Duxford in the UK awaiting restoration for display. Like the F-101, it comes in one size – LARGE……

    BSG-75
    Participant

    i really cant see there being much left of a whirlwind after 60 years of saltwater immersion, magnesium doesnt really hold up well to it 🙂

    More is the pity, but no – we’ve had some great Whirlwind threads over the years (one in US navy scrap yard late 60’s etc) but the end is always the same. Magnesium, time, salt water, add the weight of mud and the strong tides….. bet that Blenheim looks a bit different now as well !

    BSG-75
    Participant

    I would imagine that because the Severn Estuary has one of the biggest tidal ranges in the world, recovery would be extremely difficult. I’m up for it though, I’ve got me wellies ready 😮

    Andy A.

    I’ve been out on there – its scary (well, to a townie like me) with the mud and the tides.

    Surely not beyond the mechanical rhelms of possibility (financial…. ummmm) to recover and it would be interesting to see if its still there in any significant state.:confused:

    in reply to: Osprey Aircraft of the Aces/Combat Aircraft #1227689
    BSG-75
    Participant

    Going through P-36 hawk aces now, Battle Of France very interesting (especially early fights with Me-190 “D”‘s – Looking forward to the Finnish chapter as well.

    Usual high standard, well worth a punt.

    in reply to: Argosy Website #1228931
    BSG-75
    Participant

    Very first time I saw an Argosy, I mistook it for Concorde !

    It was the day (IIRC) the first commercial Concorde flight and we were “keeping” an eye out at school for it (even though Basingstoke is not generally on the Heathrow flight plan!) I was 8 or 9, saw an aircraft and I was well away.

    Had to go home and look it up in the RAF yearbook to see what it was – odd how that stayed with me (the memory, not the dodgy recognition skills) Interesting background there on the wing design as well – now as soon as you see the shape you can recognise the wing’s heritage.

    Thanks for taking the time to do this, hope it grows with time.

    in reply to: Saying Hello #1230172
    BSG-75
    Participant

    welcome aboard – doesn’t matter what you don’t know – somebody else on here will know whatever it is you need and will doubtless share it with you.

    in reply to: Vampire – Passenger version #1231201
    BSG-75
    Participant

    As did Mikoyan with the MiG-25.

    It appears to show a four-engined passenger version of the Sukhoi Su-34 ….:eek:

    Dunno anymore though…….

    Ken

    Thats impressive……… love the artwork, almost 1950’s in style…..interesting thread drift – but I wonder how many others there are, Vampire, Hunter, Canberra, Su-34, MiG-25, all classics in their own right….

Viewing 15 posts - 2,746 through 2,760 (of 3,576 total)