The A-4 combustion chamber top is amazing, I would love that. I especially like the fact it is completely folded inside out, quite astonishing, usually the combustion chambers remain fairly intact, that is the first one I have seen blown up like that!
This article is fairly good at explaining a few thoughts and views on the 109
When you look at how the 109 undercarriage is actually attatched to the aircraft it has never particulary inspired confidence in me, it is strong enough, obviously, but it is not over engineered!
I asked Charlie Brown about the handling characterisitcs of the 109 on the ground and I was fully expecting him to tell me that it was comparable to other warbirds of the era and that much of the talk of its handling on the ground was over egged, however he did not back up this view at all and told me that the 109 is particulary tricky on the ground in comparison to other warbirds and requires much more finesse and input from the pilot than other warbirds he has flown. I would love to know how the tall tail and leg compares to the smaller tail but unfortunately he never got to fly Black 2 so couldn’t expand on that.
Are you after details of components or, do you want to know how these systems worked? As you may know, there are major differences between the equipment fitted to variants of the 109. Please give me more info and, I can advise. Rgd’s, A
I’ve seen it before, it looks horten/gliderish!
That’s not necessarily original, as the instruments will slip in either way. Must admit, that it looks like they are installed as intended, as there probably would have been marks on the panel.
True, But the pipes are bent so the gauges are fitted from behind and not the front if they had been fitted the other way round someone would have had to rebend the pipes a bit to refit them from behind. From what I know of german wooden panels the usual method of instrument attatchment is using wood screws with the instruments mounted form the front that just use the screws to hold them in, here it looks like nuts and bolts have been used and the instruments are mounted from the rear which is a bit different
yes its the standard O2 setup (apart from the thing with medi written on it!) but interesting that the gauges mount from behind rather than from the front. You may have to spend quite alot to get it, 02 wachters go for around 100 Euro, sauerstoff pressure gauge another 100 Euros, the 02 Dusche go for around 200 euro so even without the panel price its not going to go for £20!
The americans have a similar gauge and its called a blinker, on the german wachter the luminous ‘arms’ swing in and out of view as the user breathes to show oxygen is flowing
Mid war instruments, not the last types and not the earliest. They have the simplified makers plates with Fertigungskennzeichen
very true Baz,
Heres my guess just for fun, probably all completely wrong.

Could try and guess the instruments?
Top row
Vsi, Asi, wendezeiger, Altimeter
only problem is: German period altimeters have a subscale setting nob on the bottom, there has to be a cut out for this protrusion in the panel, none of the cutouts have this extra cut out part. For me this is a bit of a problem
Edit, just noticed it, because the instruments are rear mounted all there needs to be is a tiny extra hole for the subscale setting rod (as opposed to the usual large front mounted cut out) it can be seen on the top right hand hole!
Mid central hole:
Fk38 compass?
Two smaller holes, no idea!
I’ve found with a DRSB 01 surveymetre that from about 2 feet away and in a detolf cabinet I only get the background number of clicks, going with the information I posted in the link and my own surveying of my instruments I’m not concerned, the main thing in my eyes is to be aware that some instruments are radioactive, the dust can be dangerous and to therefore take the necessary precautions to prevent unecessary exposure to it.
see under R on this page and then under: Radioaktivität Leuchtmasse bei Geräten Strahlung
for a detailed survey of german instruments.
http://www.cockpitinstrumente.de/archiv/Dokumente/web/new%20site/frames2/Dokumente.htm
One other thing…..stick an instrument panel in a thick lead crystal glass cabinet and the only way you prove it is a ‘problem’ is to take it out! A bit like saying, the only way to prove a sheathed dagger is dangerous is to take it out and cut yourself!
Just to add to Rocketeers interesting post. With German WWII instruments later in the war lots of instruments are only luminous and not radioactive, the non radioactive paint is quite thick and has a green tinge to look at, german radium paint looks a bit more ‘sandy’ and has a more yellowey colour to it, However there are many german instruments with non radioactive faces that have radioactive hands on them. I have seen switches etc that were painted with non radioactive luminous paint that have been vandalised by someone removing it obviously thinking it was radioactive, which of course if it was would have been massively more dangerous than just leaving the thing alone. The germans were keen on using thick blobs of radium on selector switches such as the kuhlerklappen schalters and the magneto switches, These have no glass in front of them so are a bit more hot than other items.