dark light

Augsburgeagle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 390 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: An observation…. #1180320
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    I was going to say something, a couple of threads ok but it’s a bit of a free for all at the moment.

    in reply to: Prop ID required please #1184357
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    Five seconds of searching on google brings up:
    SA226-TC

    in reply to: Disappointed… #1187489
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    is it not fair to reason that the first photo with annotations is just a re-touch of the second photo, rather than being different photos, looks like it to me. The Germans loved doing it in their manuals and it looks like that is what has been done here

    in reply to: Other uses of engines… #1191957
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant
    in reply to: How many types have been lost? #1192020
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    Interesting, if slightly depressing, topic!

    Re the Ta152, I think the Smithsonian have at least part of one in storage…I could be mistaken though.

    Already mentioned are the Stirling, Whirlwind and Whitley; whether the Whirly is “major” (having equipped only one squadron) is debatable, but the two bombers certainly played a substantial role…

    Not quite a true wartime type, but the Hornet is such a gorgeous design I’ve got to cite it anyway; and didn’t the prototype fly before war’s end?

    Axis types, as has been noted, fared even worse than their Allied counterparts…

    Ju188, 288, 388

    Do17, 215, 217

    Hs129

    He70, 112

    G4M “Betty”

    B5N “Kate”

    A5M “Claude”

    Ki27 “Nate”

    Ki44 Shoki “Tojo”

    …and a slew of others from “the other side”. Then there are the French types, only a tiny handful of fighter types having survived, with a Bloch light bomber getting the chop as late as the seventies…

    S.

    Ta152 is just in need of restoring,
    JU388 also exists and is in near perfect condition just needs a little bit of TLC
    217 rear fuselage exists. Few bits of 129 hanging round too and I would be astounded if there are no wrecks surviving somewhere in a russian bog!

    A 177 would be very nice, great shame none were saved

    in reply to: Red 7 Flies again! #1194524
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    I am confused, wasn’t D-FWWC the prototype? Which one is G-FWCC?

    A typo

    in reply to: Red 7 Flies again! #1194708
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    FWCC has flown, it is the first Flugwerk 190!

    in reply to: Red 7 Flies again! #1195279
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    As to the Flugwerk 190’s I’m not so sure about all of them, here are the ones I know of

    D-FWJS, Don’t know who owns it Germany

    D-FWAB Tom Blair UK

    D-FWWC Germany

    Another one is lurking in Darois France F-AZZJ
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-AiqTm__sc&feature=channel_page

    FW190D-9 Flugwerk Tom Blair kissimee florida, I think it is D-FWSC

    in reply to: Red 7 Flies again! #1195289
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    I have lost track, so how many Daimler Benz engined Bf109’s are currently airworthy now, and where are they all?

    And how many of these FlugWerk replica Focke Wulf 190’s? There must be a few of them flying now, right?

    None of the following photos are mine

    FMBB G-6 Messerschmitt Stuftung

    Black 2 G-10 Messerschmitt Stiftung (currently being repaired)

    Red 7 G-4 Messerschmitt Stiftung

    White 14 E-3 Russel Group Canade

    Yellow 8 E-3 Paul Allen

    There are however many current restorations to airworthy with Daimler engines occuring at the moment,
    in the next few years the number of airworthies will hopefully rise sharply. I have even spoken to someone restoring a G-12!

    in reply to: Red 7 Flies again! #1196820
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    I must admit I haven’t got a clue about red 7’s scheme, I quite like it though. I’m not a great fan of FMBB’s but black 2 is fairly good, they have chosen a halfway between durability and authenticity and it has worked out well.
    Personally I am one for complete authenticity but that is just my approach to restoration, perhaps when it comes down to the third re-spraying of a scheme then I might concede a bit for durability but certainly on the aicraft I’m working on at the moment we are going to try complete authenticity first and see how it goes, and by that I mean the original spec paints and methods, hand painted markings etc. while it’s still clinging to the aircraft it will look fantastic to those with an eye for authenticity, punters will just think it looks scruffy though 😉

    in reply to: Red 7 Flies again! #1197083
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    The 190’s scheme is deffinately an improvement but I don’t think anyones nailed a really accurate scheme yet, I’m talking the way the scheme is painted and what paint is used, but that’s personal preference for operating an aircraft.

    Just to remind what Red 7 looked like:

    http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/71/bf109g4crash003jm5.jpg

    in reply to: Red 7 Flies again! #1198141
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    10 out of 10 for perseverence, it amazes me how these Germans keep having these landing accidents and then repairing them, makes you wonder about Black 6 dosn’t it?

    Not really,
    Red 7’s first crash was due to pilot troubles, happens with everybody, second failure was due to un-noticed undercarriage damage from the first accident, that was unlucky and now it is flying again. Black 2 has flown for however many years now without incident untill the gear doesnt lock down one day, for an aircraft with a war time life of a matter of weeks and a few hours flying they are doing extremely well. Despite everything when it comes to operating old aircraft there is still that dimension of luck that comes to play

    in reply to: Pathfinder markers – Photographs? #1204430
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    it does,
    but it gives some rather weird visual effects, bombers on acid?

    in reply to: Factory Cutaways? #1204737
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    I own a 605 injection pump de-aereator factory cut away, it is extremely well done, so well done in fact that even the gaskets are neatly cut, I also own its brother off the same pump and that is the boost capsule, equally well done, unfortunately I missed buying the fuel pump that went with it so after all these years they got split up. I have seen quite a few 605 fuel pump cutaways and also instrument cut aways but don’t own any, I have a picture though taken at a fliegerschule in 39 or early 40’s and it shows a table with numerous instrument cutaways on it. Unfortunately i’m half way round the world at the moment and don’t have any access to them to post photos, sorry!

    in reply to: 1980 Biggin Hill Invader Crash (New Thread) #1207412
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    then, respectfully, pilots like myself who were not even born when this occured would not be able to learn from the mistakes and would have less understanding and respect for the legislation that comes about from accidents such as this.

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 390 total)