dark light

Martin Bull

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 127 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Is this PC gone too far? #1890150
    Martin Bull
    Participant

    I can still remember it now, smacked, straight home (we were at the shops) into bed with no tea etc.

    It’s quite obvious that you were abused as a child and denied your fundamental human rights under EU Regulation A/XRW/679025 Subsection 27(D)AF9645 Paragraph 27(b). Please furnish us with with details of your parents in order that they may pay their debt to society……;)

    in reply to: Did Scarecrows Really Exist? #1159022
    Martin Bull
    Participant

    I have an original photo, taken by a Lancaster air gunner during a daylight operation in 1944/5. He snapped the photo just as the Lancaster he was hoping to capture on film exploded without warning. No apparent flak, no fighter attacks. I’ve read of similar events on other raids. Hence my suspicion concerning the Type 37 Long Delay Pistol – it had a nasty habit of exploding the bombs without warning, and it was in widespread use by Bomber Command at this stage of the war. See:-

    There was some correspondence in early issues of the Bomber Command Association Newsletter which would seem to support suspicion of the No. 37 pistol – in particular a letter in BCA Newsletter #15 from Mr N Cooper, the Station Armament Officer at Skellingthorpe in 1944/45.

    in reply to: General Discussion #300442
    Martin Bull
    Participant

    I must say it was nice to see some overtaking, for a change….;)

    in reply to: Jenson Button #1890413
    Martin Bull
    Participant

    I must say it was nice to see some overtaking, for a change….;)

    in reply to: 20MM MG/FF #1812444
    Martin Bull
    Participant

    Briefly, the MG/FF was an older, drum-fed Oerlikon-type cannon whereas the MG151 was a more efficient, later belt-fed 20mm cannon developed by Mauser ( I think ). ‘MG’ was ‘mascinengewehr’ or machine-gun whereas ‘MK’ was ‘maschinenkanone’ or machine cannon ( I think )…..

    Sorry about all the ‘I thinks’ – just off to work so don’t have time to look in any of my books 😮

    in reply to: Saturday at Dx. #472625
    Martin Bull
    Participant

    Very impressive pictures – especially bearing in mind that light conditions were far from ideal.

    in reply to: 619 Sqn History….. #1159966
    Martin Bull
    Participant

    I’m afraid I can’t except to say that it perhaps seems unlikely, particularly given the discipline of operating within 5 Group. I also have a copy of the book ‘619 Squadron RAF April 1943-July 1945’ privately published in 1978 which makes use of many veterans’ recollections and there’s no mention of such ‘excursions’…..

    in reply to: East Kirkby RAFB 90th Anniversay show 01-08-09 #475991
    Martin Bull
    Participant

    There were no Spitfires, and I wasn’t aware of any BBMF involvement. But rather than focus on wasn’t there ( for which as we all know there can be many reasons ) and speaking as an ordinary spectator, I’d give a big thumbs-up to all who did support the show with a big thank-you to Peter Vacher for allowing us all the opportunity to see his very historic Hurricane.:)

    in reply to: East Kirkby RAFB 90th Anniversay show 01-08-09 #476311
    Martin Bull
    Participant

    I can’t match the excellent shots above with my ‘toy’ camera, but thought I’d post a few anyway – it was such a good day at East Kirkby ; a real ‘Garden Party’ atmosphere.

    ( Apologies for concentrating on Hurricane R4118 – star of the show for me !:o )

    http://s23.photobucket.com/albums/b380/jgfive/EKirkby09/EastKirkby09061.jpg

    http://s23.photobucket.com/albums/b380/jgfive/EKirkby09/EastKirkby09013.jpg

    http://s23.photobucket.com/albums/b380/jgfive/EKirkby09/EastKirkby09019.jpg

    http://s23.photobucket.com/albums/b380/jgfive/EKirkby09/EastKirkby09025.jpg

    http://s23.photobucket.com/albums/b380/jgfive/EKirkby09/EastKirkby09068.jpg

    http://s23.photobucket.com/albums/b380/jgfive/EKirkby09/EastKirkby09083.jpg

    in reply to: East Kirkby RAFBF Airshow 2009 #1161967
    Martin Bull
    Participant

    A grand day out….. A lovely friendly show, well organised, and the excellent commentary by K E stopped as appropriate to allow
    the aircraft noise to be heard. If I had to single out one display it would be Keith Dennison in the Hurricane – superb !

    I’ll second all of that ! A very memorable day ; the organization and atmosphere were superb. It was very nice to be able to savour the Hurricane display with no distractions or interruptions.

    Well done to all at East Kirkby – it was well worth the trip up from London.:cool:

    in reply to: Dunholme Lodge #1161970
    Martin Bull
    Participant

    There are a couple of books around which give information about Dunholme Lodge, but being self-published they’re not too easy to find….

    Anyhow, they are : –

    The Dunholme ‘Lodgers’ by John Ward ( JoTe Publications 2004 )

    The Last Flight Of Lancaster LL919 W by Anne Grimshaw (1999) – this one has very good wartime plans of the airfield and sites ; the Thorpe Camp Museum had a few copies recently.

    Dunholme is also included in After The Battle’s ‘Bases Of Bomber Command – Then & Now’ by Roger A Freeman.

    Martin Bull
    Participant

    ….also there will be ample cockpit time with the pilot

    http://s23.photobucket.com/albums/b380/jgfive/XS458/XS458114.jpg

    If anyone’s hesitating over whether to go or not, I can recommend it ! 😉

    in reply to: Newark Air Museum #1174076
    Martin Bull
    Participant

    I’m another one late to this thread, and I certainly don’t wish to be involved in a ‘punch-up’ – but thought it only fair to speak up for the NAM and their Lightning in particular.

    I called in late in May just to photograph the Lightning ( and happily paid my entrance fee 😉 ). One of the NAM people noticed my interest and kindly allowed me up-close to the T5 which is certainly looking ‘rough’. He went into great detail about the aircraft, its history, and more importantly the NAM’s plans for an eventual full restoration. Museums cannot restore everything at once ( much as they’d like to ) and money is always short – as is volunteers’ time.

    Personally I think that Newark do a superb job, they have some remarkable exhibits – and, if you’re at such a museum and have some questions, try to find a helper or volunteer to ask ; they’ll often be pleased to tell you the full story…..

    in reply to: 190 trouble? #1175749
    Martin Bull
    Participant

    I would second that, Its take off was stunning it seemed to gain a lot of height in no time at all.
    The routine was very punchy with some lovely rolls, Low passes and as already mentioned impressive climbs.
    I really hope to have the chance to see her again soon.

    I’ll third it ! 😮 I’m no expert, and I’ll admit to being excited at the sight of this aircraft, but I thought that the pilot put on a splendid show. It certainly gave me a good impression of how the Fw190, whether replica or real, was a force to be reckoned with.

    in reply to: Duxford – Improving Facilities (& Kemble) #1177172
    Martin Bull
    Participant

    I very rarely go to Biggin Hill but I do recall going there a few years ago and sitting in a temporary stand which was set back a little from the crowd-line. I certainly enjoyed my view of the ‘action’ and didn’t mind spending the extra few pounds.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 127 total)