dark light

Tigershark

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 255 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Tigershark
    Participant

    Bad comparison.
    Su-35 is well tested and….in service.
    Not to mention it is not exactly a “brand new” design, so the comparison to J-10 is moot.

    This thing isn’t anywhere close to service, if it ever enters it.

    su35 is still testing it is even said so in the russian thread! still testing missile. There is even more f35 than su35 and f35 is not in service yet! maybe you do not understand production model that is going in a testing phase.

    j10 is in service, there are over 200! of course j10 is being built because it is like the f16. when f35 is ready to go then f16 will begin stopping production and that will be the fate of j10 and j21.

    j21 is for export and because china and russia are allies china can sell j21 to russia to replace mig29 and offer russia cheaper alternative to pakfa.

    in reply to: Japan Self-Defense Forces – News & Discussion – Season 1 #2308561
    Tigershark
    Participant
    Tigershark
    Participant

    60 of what, an unproven testbed with RD-93s?

    Impressive.
    China still produces J-10.

    su35 not proven either it is not in service in any country yet. j10 is in service. see big difference?

    in reply to: Shenyang J-21/31/F-60/AMF thread part 1 #2308601
    Tigershark
    Participant

    LOL laughing so hard. china can already make two stealth fighters but japan and korea cannot even make one. j21 is smaller then j20 but even if it is small it seem to have more bay space than the larger pakfa

    Tigershark
    Participant

    If rosoboronexport can’t get a legal guaranty from China on a Su-35S deal which include sales on 60+ figure, there will never ever be any Su-35S export to China.
    Its as simple as that, end of story.

    why China needs 60 of su35 when they can make 60 of these

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Dfabpht9PWc/UFWRU90eaxI/AAAAAAAACTE/lJQvPcChuKg/s1600/J21.png

    china moved on..

    Tigershark
    Participant

    su35 is not bad airplane and it is good for its generation but China do not need it because China already have j11, j10b, j20 and j19.

    its like selling rafale to America when American can make f22 and f35.

    in reply to: Vietnamese Navy #2012579
    Tigershark
    Participant

    The first Vietnam’s 636 Submarine Kilo class diesel-electric will be launched at the shipyard Admiralteiskye (St Petersburg) in August this year – a source of information from the defense industry The Russian said this on Tuesday.

    December 2009, Prime Minister of Vietnam Nguyen Tan Dung signed a contract to purchase six Russian Kilo class submarines worth about 2 billion 636 million U.S. dollars.

    The first submarine under the contract to be launched in August this year, then will start the test cycle of the ship, – the source said. Also according to this person, before the end of 2012, the first submarine to deliver to the order. All contracts are scheduled for completion in 2016.

    The 636 submarine is 3100 tons of water, speed 20 knots / hour, the ability to dive 300 meters deep, with a crew of 52 people. It is equipped with weapons such as torpedoes 533 mm (six units), landmines, Kalibr rocket attack combinations.
    Russian have finished the first of six submarines for Vietnam Navy

    why vietnam buy so many navy ship these days? it is very provocative for peace

    in reply to: China wants to make Su-35 clones? #2313220
    Tigershark
    Participant

    su35 is a nice plane but China already has moved on to next generation aircraft. does not make sense much to go backwards. j20 for high end and j19/f20 for low end. actually it make more sense for russia to buy j19 from china because russia does not have a program to replace mig29.

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 21 #2315400
    Tigershark
    Participant

    I dont think visibility is too important for 5G sensors and netcentric warfare.
    5G fighter suppose to fly higher than all the fighters. so pilot has to look downward more often.
    There alot of reduced RCS fighters like Rafale that dont have one piece canopy. why dont chinese implement single piece canopy in all other fighters beside J-20.

    rafael is 4 gen aircraft. j20 and f22 is 5 gen aircraft that is why there is one piece. new Chinese fighter j19 is also one piece because it is for stealth reason
    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-z9ethM62hWU/TooSH281-VI/AAAAAAAAAWw/bO1uPXPR8nQ/s1600/China%2527s+SAC+J-19+Stealth+Fighter+Jet.jpg

    in reply to: Pak-Fa news thread part 20 #2318016
    Tigershark
    Participant

    f23 fail because bay is not big enough like f22. f23 use back and front style bay that pakfa also use but in the end f22 style bay can carry more efficently.
    that is why j20 is more influence by f22 style bay and can carry much more
    http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2011/07/23/J20%20weapons%20bay.jpg
    this one is official diagram

    in reply to: FA-50, really comparable to Tejas? #2353527
    Tigershark
    Participant

    Watch your words, it never flies? If Indian air force don’t want it, why Indian Navy want it to be navy version?

    Indian navy fighter cannot be accepted. It needs to be fixed
    http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/ain-defense-perspective/2012-05-04/indias-naval-lca-flies-needs-more-power

    airforce version is the same, always under infinity fixing.

    in reply to: NEW CHINESE STEALTH FIGHTER SIGHTED #2354795
    Tigershark
    Participant

    this one may use two ws-13 engine like the one jf-17 will be using.

    in reply to: NEW CHINESE STEALTH FIGHTER SIGHTED #2357755
    Tigershark
    Participant

    I see this thing as one of many twin engine, 5th gen medium weight fighters to be developed, like AMCA, ATD-X, KAI KFX, TFX (and now J-21/F-60). Funnily enough the most low profile (J-21’s existence would’ve been disregarded without a thought a few weeks ago) aircraft may well be the first to make its maiden flight, if the rumours about september turn out to be true.

    they can just buy F-60 from China and not waste money those country will become in Chinese sphere anyway like good old days.

    in reply to: NEW CHINESE STEALTH FIGHTER SIGHTED #2357758
    Tigershark
    Participant

    Apparently, paralay didn’t get the memo about 12 meters max length. Shame…

    foreigner always underestemate Chinese skill. But China can already make better stealth fighter than Russia and now China have new fighter better than F-35. nothing can stop China now. :diablo:

    in reply to: PLAN News Thread #4 #2017893
    Tigershark
    Participant

    J-15 begin seen on the deck of the carrier. but not sure if it is flying on it.

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 255 total)