dark light

LesB

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 681 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Canberra WH872…..? #1301427
    LesB
    Participant

    WH872

    Scrapped by 327 (ATC) Sqn, Kilmarnock, Strathclyde (nose section) fate unknown. 🙁

    Contact them.

    .

    in reply to: Canberra T.22 Cockpit #1305824
    LesB
    Participant

    Which canberra cockpit is this? Any pics?

    WT525, see potted history here.

    Unique cockpit. It’s the only nearly displayable T.22 left anywhere!

    😉

    in reply to: Concorde at RAF Finningley #1308663
    LesB
    Participant

    Galaxy

    You were allowed to walk through the Galaxy and when you are 8 that was something amazing.

    Here it is then, the Galaxy at Finningley 1980, doors open both ends. Should bring out your inner child andy. :rolleyes:

    http://www.canberra.plus.com/pics/key/Finn-10.jpg

    😀

    in reply to: 2008 Anniversaries #1314753
    LesB
    Participant

    Personal

    Joined the RAF in October 1958.

    (Not very significant some might say, but it changed my life!)

    😎

    in reply to: Canberra bombing radar/ Blue Shadow radar? #1241989
    LesB
    Participant

    Yes.

    .

    in reply to: Nimrod Survivors #1245956
    LesB
    Participant

    . . . was completely amazed when I later found out someone in Italy bought the nose! I would like to know more about that?

    Brief background to XH132 here

    Hope this helps.

    .

    in reply to: Last RAF Canberra PR.9's #1253652
    LesB
    Participant

    J. . . hello Les by the way

    Hi yourself Jase. You still defending the country? PM me sometime.

    As for pressurisations, well, I’ve always wondered about it as you say. Can’t really talk for the 9 as I have only ever done turn-rounds, A/Fs and B /Fs on them, nothing ‘deep’ at all (tyre changes, flap change, etc). But I wonder if airframe pressurisation happens anyway? Can it actually be de-selected?

    Memory is hazy here so need another Canberra rigger to say if Cans started partial pressurisation pretty much as soon as the wheels left the deck. As I said, my thought is it happens anyway. I know that when seeing a Canberra in you don’t go near the entrance door until the jockey opens the DV window. And on B(I)8s you let the nav open the door. Opening the cockpit of a 9 would be the equivalent I guess.

    :confused:

    .

    in reply to: Last RAF Canberra PR.9's #1253874
    LesB
    Participant

    Mean that of the three, 134 is the last best hope for mankind.

    .

    in reply to: Last RAF Canberra PR.9's #1253884
    LesB
    Participant

    *crushed for life by sarcasm*

    I think you can get an ointment for that! 😉

    .

    in reply to: Last RAF Canberra PR.9's #1253897
    LesB
    Participant

    Last I heard was that the leasing deal with the MoD had fallen through and the owner(s) were considering selling them off. Heard that at least one museum is interested in one of them – but break-down and transport cost are a key factor.

    The PR.9s have very few (if any in the case of two of them) pressurisation cycles left. XH134 (I think) is the most likely to get into the luft again for a few filghts – if a reliable source of squids and Avpin can be found. Depends on the owner, the CAA and whether or not the frame is considered safe to fly as a civvie.

    Gratuitous Canberra pic of XH134 doing a low, fast fly-by during the impromptu mini-display while waiting for the other two to show up in the overhead.

    http://www.bywat.co.uk/end/kem1.jpg

    Yes Nashio, the tailplane looks good, but the commemoration fin paint-job looks even better.:D

    .

    in reply to: I want one… #1270144
    LesB
    Participant

    Radar reflector trials models were quite common but little seen in the old days. Here’s a pic of a Canberra radar returns model which is now resident at Newark Aviation Museum.

    .

    in reply to: Link Trainer – need advice #1272715
    LesB
    Participant

    The Link Trainer at MAM is painted yellow. This could be a whim though as it used to be blue. :rolleyes:

    .

    in reply to: Red Flag Vulcans #1275878
    LesB
    Participant

    Just to add . . .

    This pic of camo trials shows the effectiveness of the ‘northern latitudes’ camo for the Vulc.

    in reply to: No safety on UK nuclear warheads #1791574
    LesB
    Participant

    Les,
    Didn’t the first B(I)8 weapon lack PAL (too old, too early) and the second have it?

    You could be right Jacko, I left all that behind in ’65 so the “B(I)8 Phase II” stuff when they all gathered together at Laarbruch my have had the PAL system. Could find out I suppose from Cranberry pilots of the day I still know (they’re getting fewer every year 🙁 ), but it was all so long ago and seems so uninteresting now. But then when the Buccs and Phants (and Jags) showed up it all took off in a different direction so you’re probably right.

    Anyway, doesn’t really matter what you write Jacko, you’ll never convince the likes of plawolf of the truth of those days.

    Arthur,
    I believe that there were nuke facilities at Bruggen, Geilenkirchen, Laarbruch and Wildenrath – and maybe at Alhorn and Wahn and Gutersloh too…..

    The main clutch stations all had nuke facilities, don’t know about Wahn but Alhorn must have had as 123 Sqn started there with their B(I)6s.

    .

    in reply to: No safety on UK nuclear warheads #1791583
    LesB
    Participant

    Arthur
    14 Sqn was at Wildenrath with Canberra B(I)8s from 1962 to 1970 and stood nuke QRA. In fact they were there when their numberplate was 88 Sqn (still with B(I)8s) which had been formed there in 1958. 88 Sqn was re-numbered 14 Sqn in December 1962 -I was at their party!

    Jacko
    Responding to your previous – the B(I)8s didn’t have the PAL system even though the weapon was the US Project E. Did come with a contingent of US “Guardians” though and it was one of these chaps that shot the leccy in the leg.

    .

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 681 total)