dark light

Smith

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 1,284 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: B-17s and B-25s over Broadway London(?) July 2005 #1253758
    Smith
    Participant

    hang on a minute

    Dave (and others) the Sally B website says July 10, are you sure about the 17th – perhaps a week out?

    http://sallyb.dcgservices.com/programme_frameset.php

    in reply to: B-17s and B-25s over Broadway London(?) July 2005 #1253762
    Smith
    Participant

    that was quick

    Many thanks Dave, cheers Don

    in reply to: What went wrong with this B24? #1286637
    Smith
    Participant

    Perhaps someonme could ID the unit (and then a googling we will go). The multi-coloured tailplane and diamond on the tail and so on should give more than hint to someone in the know?

    in reply to: General Discussion #339864
    Smith
    Participant

    Thanks guys … learning every day!

    in reply to: Why are clouds bumpy? #1941428
    Smith
    Participant

    Thanks guys … learning every day!

    in reply to: General Discussion #340042
    Smith
    Participant

    Having tried the usual “pay” suspects (Norton, Trend Micro, etc.) I agree 100% and thoroughly recommend Avast. It ripped archived trojans out of my system the others couldn’t touch and appears after nearly 3 months use to be really good. For one thing it doesn’t ‘eff with my system … just keeps the bad guys at bay. And it’s free! Good stuff.

    in reply to: Free antivirus #1941475
    Smith
    Participant

    Having tried the usual “pay” suspects (Norton, Trend Micro, etc.) I agree 100% and thoroughly recommend Avast. It ripped archived trojans out of my system the others couldn’t touch and appears after nearly 3 months use to be really good. For one thing it doesn’t ‘eff with my system … just keeps the bad guys at bay. And it’s free! Good stuff.

    in reply to: Bomber Command Campaign Medal Petition #1291757
    Smith
    Participant

    only UK residents need apply !!!

    Assorted inappropriate language !!!!! Think Captain Haddock.

    That petition states “You must be a British citizen or resident to sign the petition”.

    That’s really disappointing and inappropriate. In fact I’m angry. A significant proportion of Bomber Command aircrew and casualties came from the Commonwealth. They should be recognised. And therefore Commonwealth citizens should be given a dispensation to petition for that recognition.

    in reply to: Big Me262 News! #1299912
    Smith
    Participant

    TACTICS

    Trying to remember clearly here what I’ve read in numerous sources. IIRC there were 3 basic attack techniques used by the Luftwaffe against the B17/24 formations.

    Head on … hit and run … used by the majority of 109 and 190 day fighter staffeln … throttled back, very high closure speed all the same, very short aiming/firing window (only a second or two) requiring very high accuracy, then throttle open and dive away (to come around again)

    From the rear by the sturm 190s, heavily armoured, slow closure speed, you took a lot of hits but what the hell, the idea was to close, deliver as many cannon sheels as possible and take out one bomber = success. So what if the 190’s stuffed.

    From the rear by the 262s, a shallow dive from well above and behind, pull up, sight and let fly, then what? I don’t recall. Power up through the formation or break away and down? Safety was the speed of movement (ie. difficulty of a gunner getting a good bead on a 262).

    And what about the Zerstorers? What were their tactics?

    in reply to: BoB Combat Report Question #1304423
    Smith
    Participant

    Can anyone post a photo or illustration (of the 162)? Someone with the bandwidth to post it that is :rolleyes:

    Pic below comes from http://avia.russian.ee/air/germany/me-162.html
    I can see how a Do-17 would pass for one in the heat of battle

    Also look here http://www.1000aircraftphotos.com/APS/2191.htm

    in reply to: Kiwi's Remembered In London #1310728
    Smith
    Participant

    Thanks Ian

    Saw the unveiling ceremony on TV this evening, lots of Royal family and other dignatories and of course Kiwis. I am looking forward to visiting this unique and IMO great looking monument.

    Don

    in reply to: Identifying Bomber Command losses #1319216
    Smith
    Participant

    He didn’t and I see what’s happened … have I created this confusion? In my post #21 above I referenced Schellwat’s first claim (near Hactal) not noticing he claimed two that night. Kev35 in his post #14 is talking abouit the second claim near Peer … 19 minutes later. The 5276 appearing both times is the (nightfighter) grid location. See Mhuxt post #22 about how to interpret the data.

    in reply to: Identifying Bomber Command losses #1320240
    Smith
    Participant

    Photograph

    Here we have the three likely lads … from L to R … Les, Eric and Lloyd

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v688/smidon/LesEricLloyd.jpg

    in reply to: Identifying Bomber Command losses #1321065
    Smith
    Participant

    Many thanks for your help mhuxt … much appreciated

    in reply to: Identifying Bomber Command losses #1321070
    Smith
    Participant

    44 Squadron lost a second aircraft that night, Lancaster III EE123 KM-K, six of the crew were killed and the surviving crew member was captured.

    In fact that second aircraft was Pete Holt (age 19) and his crew, as referred to in Lloyd’s diary entries [post 12 above].

    http://www.cwgc.org/search/casualty_details.aspx?casualty=2645655

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 1,284 total)