If Americans think we shouldn’t mind if they paint French tail markings on an RAF aircraft, presumably they wouldn’t mind a Mustang with American stars on the wings and Russian stars on the fuselage.
I do know the French fin flash was normally actually on the rudder, but was/is it always rudder and not fin?
Would anyone know how the engines in the Macchi are coupled together? Or how they managed to start the beast?
I’m not sure they were coupled together. They drove what appeared to be a contraprop, but I believe, like the Gannet each engine had it’s own prop.
Just looked back at JDK’s pic and you can see they’re totally separate.
Look at the pitch on those props!
Putnam Miles book on ebay now.
A day and a half to go and already Β£51!
As an aside to this thread, seeing the mention of Lindemann, anywhere his name comes up he appears to be a menace to the development of anything.
Unfortunately, Churchill thought the sun shone out of his a***.
A 20th century equivalent of Dr Dionysus (sp) Lardner in the 19th C.
Herbert, you could try these two.
http://www.modelfixings.co.uk/
BA screws are still regularly used in modelmaking.
There was a wartime propaganda article or film (film from memory) about building a Wellington in 24 hours. Apparently it appeared to be done but there was a degree of cheating involved.
No idea where or when I read about it (not recently) so can’t help with source or links.
Tea, large, strong (very).
Repeat until somebody who can drive a kitchen comes home.
I finished the only film I had with me just before the Lanc/Tornado flypast. I thought one of the gang with lenses like telegraph poles would get one so wasn’t too worried.
As it turned out, you’d have been lucky to get them in the same shot with a full 180ΒΊ fish-eye lens.
Does somebody look after you, Al? π
And if not, why?
Paint is in remarkable condition after 64 years in the depths!!!!!
Not just the paint, the rest of it’s pretty impressive.
He managed to hide the mossie …
It wasn’t hidden if you knew where to look for it. π It spent some time in one of the blister hangars at Panshanger, although I didn’t know then that it was the prototype.
As Bruce said, design work on the DH99, an enlarged Sabre-powered Mossie was started. It was later renumbered to DH101. They were then told that Sabres wouldn’t be available and Griffons would have to be used. As the performance would have been lower it was abandoned.
Construction started on the DH102, a lower performance night bomber with Griffons or Merlins to carry a 5,000lb bomb load. It was abandoned when the Hornet took priority.
Despite my admiration for all things de Havilland, they do seem to have had a bit of a blind spot about rear fuselage strength. IIRC, one or more of the Albatrosses (Albatri?) suffered the same problem.
I was there last week and I’m fairly sure the posters said admission was Β£22.50
Plan A is we’ll be there on Saturday.
Not really relevant to this thread but looking at ML796 yesterday I said “Wassat under the wingtips?” Complete waste of time as I knew the two people I was with wouldn’t have a clue. So, what are those bulges under the wings? They’re even more obvious now as the floats currently aren’t fitted.
I suspect there may not be enough for a book on the subject. As already said, the CR42s were decimated on the first raid and I’m not certain they were used again. I think there was a similar scenario with a bomber raid although I can’t remember any details and wouldn’t take that as fact.
Edit:
The official history of the RAF 1939-1945 (HMSO 1953/4) seemed a good place to look but there doesn’t appear to be a single reference to the Regia Aeronautica over the UK.
By the looks of that, Steve, I would say you’ve cracked it!
What are they. (It seems I’m going to have to start wearing my glasses when I use the PC, or get a bigger screen).