Resprodlica.
I agree this thread has been done before many times.Simple thing is parts made 60 odd years ago have a hard time keeping up with the times and will inevitably wear out.Same as todays parts will inevitably wear out in time.The thing is keeping the “skills” alive so these parts will continued to be replaced by competent individuals so future generations will see what our Grandfathers went to war in to protect our freedoms.;)
More disturbing
Is the fact that the scrap dealers are taking the memorials with no questions asked.Maybe they are oblivious to them or maybe they have no idea about them.
Fuel tanks.
There is a fireproof bulkhead between the fuel tank and the pilot.PR spits had pressurized pits so unsure if any leaks could manifest themselves as being visible on the bottom of the cockpit.If it was on a fitting the leak could backtrack along the line and seep into the cabin that way.Wing tanks could be seen as a fine haze coming from behind the wing in flight if it was bad enough.A winding down gauge would be your first sign of something amiss.
Try here…
These guys should know….
http://www.lighthorse.org.au/forum/forum.asp?FORUM_ID=2
Nightfighters…
Late in the war many of the front line Nightfighter units,amongst them the elite pilots were transfered to Defence of the Reich Staffels to help stop the endless flow of B24,s and B17,s during the day.Also there were bomber crews and others hastily retrained.You could find many of them with the rocket Mortars fitted,much to the disgust of the crews as they slowed the planes down considerably and made them an easier target again for roving P51,s.Many of the top pilots were wasted this way and eventually the luftwaffe was bled dry of it,s experienced crews.
Mortars
Only used during the day to break up the bomber formations.At night the launch flare would have seriously damaged the pilots night vision,plus place a big “I am here” sign for roving Mosquito,s to pick up on.
From Down Under
Merry Christmas to all and a prosperous and peaceful NewYear.:)
Ju87G
There is some footage of Rudel at Kursk taking a second or third volley from his Paks to destroy targets..
Link here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cU6OK1zSxKg 😮
True..
The Tiffies delivery service does tend to be “misguided” sometimes,thats why they had 8 rockets each and attacked in one or two Squadron lines.A Firefly (Upgunned Sherman) would be a more efficient choice.:diablo:
drawings
I think it was just Ford updating the drawings to bring them online with the rest of their manufacturing lines.They were one of the leading mass manufacturers of the early 20th century.The merlin is a complicated engine by American standards and I always thought it was the metallurgy that wasn,t as good as the RR counterparts.I think Damiler was better at close tolerances than RR during the early part of the war.
Cheers.
Lovely pics..Especially with the sun hiding in the clouds..:D
Interchangeability..
For the most part, the same components from Packard and Rolls-Royce Merlins can be interchanged.
Is there someone who can do up a rule of thumb for the interchangeability of RR,Packard and Meteor engines?:dev2:
Ummmm
Santa???:D
Would be the best thing made if it were true.
Yep..
I,ll second that..Preserve and duplicate..;)
Only one think I can say here….
Jesus H Christ…!!!Stunning pics..Thanks for the link..:eek: