dark light

ThreeSpool

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 1,083 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #273962
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    EU In/Out Vote

    Tackle Foreign Aid
    Tackle Quangos

    Tackle Immigration
    Tackle Business Taxes
    Tackle Employment Laws

    The last three are about helping small businesses, getting people back into jobs.

    They may not do it, neither have the three other parties, but they might.

    in reply to: Who would you vote for if the election was tomorrow? #1872432
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    EU In/Out Vote

    Tackle Foreign Aid
    Tackle Quangos

    Tackle Immigration
    Tackle Business Taxes
    Tackle Employment Laws

    The last three are about helping small businesses, getting people back into jobs.

    They may not do it, neither have the three other parties, but they might.

    in reply to: General Discussion #273969
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    I voted for UKIP last time, and I should think I’ll be voting for UKIP come 2015.

    To me, they are the only party putting out a consistent message.

    I want a party with some gumption, to deal with the real issues and the big three just don’t tick the box.

    in reply to: Who would you vote for if the election was tomorrow? #1872436
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    I voted for UKIP last time, and I should think I’ll be voting for UKIP come 2015.

    To me, they are the only party putting out a consistent message.

    I want a party with some gumption, to deal with the real issues and the big three just don’t tick the box.

    in reply to: A350 rolled out! #526976
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    *Edit…

    in reply to: A350 rolled out! #526991
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    I thought it was the A350-800 that was going to be first to fly?

    It should look much better with a couple of RR Trents hanging off it. 😀

    in reply to: General Discussion #274761
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    Not just pot and kettle, add stones, houses and glass.

    in reply to: Pot and kettle come to mind…. #1873210
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    Not just pot and kettle, add stones, houses and glass.

    in reply to: Dublin, 1 December #447669
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    It could be awaiting delivery after painting. The FlyRak A320 at the front is ex-Spanair.

    in reply to: Most dangerous Boeing defect since 1990s 737 hardovers? #527033
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    Oh, stop being so dramatic!

    I’d love to see the chaos that grounding over 900* of the safest aircraft would cause. The fact is a fault has occurred, an incident occurred and the manufacturer and regulatory bodies have investigated with the result being a repair being required.

    I’d quite happily board a 777 tomorrow, just as 1000s of other will. 🙂

    *I’ve just read that it’s 280 aircraft that are affected.

    in reply to: Most dangerous Boeing defect since 1990s 737 hardovers? #527047
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    Your assuming that the area hasn’t be (repetitively) inspected during the course of the aircraft’s life. In fact, I would think most airlines would carry out an inspection of the area on a overnight stop and based on the finding either carry out there AD repair or wait for it’s next scheduled maintenance input.

    in reply to: Heathrow 25th Nov 2012 #447743
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    I’d be proud if they were mine, well done!

    in reply to: Most dangerous Boeing defect since 1990s 737 hardovers? #527216
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    Ah, the second bit of my post wasn’t directed at you. More of a general comment. 😮

    in reply to: Most dangerous Boeing defect since 1990s 737 hardovers? #527225
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    Matt, I think you are being overly sensationalist. I’m sure everyone agrees that it was a serious defect. It could have had disastrous effects. However, I am sure Boeing knew it was a problem area and I am sure many more wiring defects were picked up during routine inspections.

    Also, you don’t just ground an aircraft to complete an AD. These can easily be incorporated into the aircraft’s maintenance schedule at an appropriate time. It is safe to say an aircraft will have a maintenance input at some point within 18 months.

    in reply to: Brighton to Paris anyone? #527424
    ThreeSpool
    Participant

    I hope it does better than the attempts of a Mr Hal… :diablo:

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 1,083 total)