dark light

Flat 12×2

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 441 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Brooklands Aviation Day, Sunday 15th October #820978
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]256380[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]256381[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Brooklands Aviation Day, Sunday 15th October #820992
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    in reply to: Mustard gas found at Woodhall Spa, two injured #823492
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    hampden98
    I’m guessing unlikely to be WW1.

    A north Hampshire Army training area still has unknown quantities of mustard gas left over from WWI buried in unkown areas on site, said to be too dangerous/too big a site to go looking for it .

    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    Hi Fiat 12-2,
    During my time of owning and operating Triumph twins (Motorcycles ) (50 yrs. ago ) The Triumph Grand prix machines and engines were highly valued. So no doubt that’s where your Cylinder block and head ,etc went to. I knew that these generators were used in RAF Aircraft, but never checked what ones. The Triumph Grand Prix Barrels would fit on same crankcase studding as a “Speed twin” set of barrels, so almost certainly your generator crankcases would take a set of “Speed Twin” Barrels if you wished to re-build it. I say that because “Grand Prix” barrels would be “Un-obtanium” these days. The Speed twin exhausts are splayed outwards wheras the Grand Prix ones run straight out in front, then curve down. You’ll also need a Twin magneto ,head and rocker boxes, oil drain pipes, oil pump, etc, etc. It looks like the std. Crankcases (Speed twin ) parts would fit your (well stripped ) engine, so an interesting project there and historic.

    First time I’ve actually seen a pic. of one of these Triumph Generators too. Presume they pumped out 24 Volts DC current. All the best with it,

    Bill T.

    Thanks for the info Bill
    It’s not mine, it’s a friend of a friends (& for sale ) whos been told it’s from a Lancaster. The missing crankcase etc. would fit in with your info

    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    Thanks for the info so far, I have also seen discussions on 100 Group aircraft & apu’s & if they had them, but no conclusion either way.

    in reply to: B29s in the Boneyard #776175
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    And still the US Navy denies any B-29 aircraft or parts are still there !

    in reply to: B29s in the Boneyard #777156
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    The other one.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]255275[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]255276[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: B29s in the Boneyard #777214
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    The Washington is/was at Socorro, NM if memory serves. And one B-29 is still to be accounted for from China Lake. Google Earth search shows one other rather demolished example still on the ranges at the northeast end.

    There is another there, but it is a very long way from the demolished one at the airport lake range,
    airport lake remains
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]255274[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2017) #798770
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    It looks like the pilot had put the gear down for his attempt at the runway, maybe not fully locked down by the time he realized he would end up in the field, so selected gear up, as the gear looks less down than the pic. moments before

    As several posts have now already mentioned !

    in reply to: Ex Yatesbury aircraft #800369
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    Wasn’t the late Radio 2 DJ Jimmy Young a PT instructor at Yatesbury ?, I am sure he once mention it in an interview.

    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    Thanks to all, definitive answer by scotaia
    from the BEA JU 52 thread.
    “BEA JU 52s
    I am doing a bit of research on Edinburgh Airport/RAF Turnhouse History and I was surprised to see that BEA operated JU 52s for a while after the war.”

    “Warplanes of the Luftwaffe” by Aerospace publishing states that ten were reconditioned by Shorts & Harland at Belfast and taken into service in November 1946 by BEA with registrations G-AHOC to ‘OL”

    “My Aircraft Registers of Great Britain (The Aviation Hobby Shops one) lists all those Ju52s as being from 100 aircraft impressed after capture in the VM and VN ranges, for possible use as transports. Most were scrapped by mid 1948 but some used by BEA (and I will not mention the pre-war ones, either!); these being registered 21/5/46, and all being listed as scrapped at Warrington 2/48.”

    “I have a feeling that the post-war Ju52s were refurbished by Shorts and therefore given Shorts construction numbers… I have it as being also c/n’d 501441 (by Junkers, and therefore its Luftwaffe serial), formerly VM923.”

    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    NEEMA
    Are the “Lancasters” possibly Lincolns?

    Could be

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]254462[/ATTACH]

    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    Well guys, that was my guess as well ! but in Belfast ?

    in reply to: Ex Yatesbury aircraft #805834
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    July 1946, wingless Halifax
    detail from https://britainfromabove.org.uk/en/image/EAW001929
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]254446[/ATTACH]

    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    For the record, the photo of the P-47 dispersal was taken at Burtonwood NOT Speke. It first appeared in Roger Freeman’s Mighty Eighth War Manual but I had doubts about it. Borrowing the ATC vehicle, I toured the old Speke Airport’s perimeter but, as suspected, could find no likely area. Soon afterwards, I checked a wartime aerial photo of Burtonwood which accurately showed the dispersal later to be occupied by the P-47s. The photo was in one of the many volumes of The Army Air Forces in WW II, I forget which. but they are now available online. I wrote to Roger with the correction and in defence he told me that the back of his photo was stamped ‘Speke’ and it seems that it remains uncorrected in the IWM collection of his archive. Roger agreed with my findings and that the photo had been mis-captioned. Thus are myths perpetuated!

    I would also suggest that the caption is wrong in that the P-47’s are there for scrapping & not redeployment, as dozens if not hundreds of P-51’s were scrapped there & the P-51 was replacing P-47’s in front line sevice at the time.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]254188[/ATTACH]

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 441 total)