Page 30 – Key Publishing

philo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 554 total)

← 1 2 3 … 29 30 31 … 35 36 37 →

Author

Posts
February 11, 2002 at 10:55 pm in reply to: Spitfire 1 Boo Hoo #2115191

philo
Participant

RE: Smoking of inhibitor

Who mentioned Jeremy Flack, Mr Flack are you here on this forum under an alias ? if so can i have my slides back PLEASE. Does API(Aviation Photographs International) still exist and where, Swindon?.
I need my material back from about 5 years ago, again PLEASE.
Phil(Phil Neale).

February 11, 2002 at 10:41 pm in reply to: Spitfire 3 – How I dream of airshows! #2115217

philo
Participant

RE: Spitfire 3 – How I dream of airshows!

Another shot.
Attachments:

February 9, 2002 at 4:13 pm in reply to: attention mr modification #2115520

philo
Participant

RE: attention mr modification

Rabie,
Thats odd ,a .pdf file is one created by Acrobat.
You are using the Acrobat reader? Acrobat5 or maybe 4.
Paint is pretty poor, you really need Photoshop or Paintshop Pro 7 for decent image manipulation.

February 9, 2002 at 4:05 pm in reply to: A medley of todays visit to Hendon #2115523

philo
Participant

RE: A medley of todays visit to Hendon

Yes, i really enjoyed it yesterday, my first visit for about 6 years. Its in a bit of a muddle at the moment as they are trying to make room for new exhibits and the extension of course, nevertheless very enjoyable, especially as its free.Mind you it makes you worry a bit about future funding.

February 8, 2002 at 10:52 pm in reply to: attention mr modification #2115562

philo
Participant

RE: attention mr modification

Dont understand that, jpg is a standard format its ,what i use for all of my postings here.The other two file extensions that you mention i dont think are digital image files, sounds more like a mail file.Your best bet is to use Acrobat reader, you should be able to open virtually any file with it, read only format mind, or if you are getting the file on CD then get it as a bmp and convert to whatever you want. A jpeg is merely a compressed file probably converted from a bmp originally, so at least as a bmp you could have decent enough res to print from,then ‘save copy as’ jpg for e-mailing purposes.
Hope this helps
Phil.

February 8, 2002 at 10:42 pm in reply to: A true classic jet… #2115564

philo
Participant

RE: A true classic jet…

Ah that explains it, i must admit i dont recall seeing her first time around, although i suppose i must have done, must scour my archive pictures again.
Phil

February 8, 2002 at 10:39 pm in reply to: A medley of todays visit to Hendon #2115567

philo
Participant

RE: A medley of todays visit to Hendon

Hudson is a MkIIIA serial No A16-199.
Picture does not show it.
Attachments:

February 8, 2002 at 7:33 pm in reply to: A true classic jet… #2115595

philo
Participant

RE: A true classic jet…

Hang on a minute, iv’e just noticed that the livery is not as per my picture in the first one, I dont think that this was taken during the same period, unless the top shot was taken during pre-display tests and she was repainted just prior to her short stint in public.In fact I suspect its a diferent aircraft altogether, unless of course she was re-serialed.
Your thoughts please.

Phil.

February 8, 2002 at 7:26 pm in reply to: A true classic jet… #2115596

philo
Participant

RE: A true classic jet…

Here’s an airborne picture of the Sea Hawk FGA.6 during her all to brief display career in 1997, hopefully the jetpipe will be repaired soon and she will be put back on the scene.
Attachments:

February 8, 2002 at 7:05 pm in reply to: Bruntingthorpe Spit #2115599

philo
Participant

RE: Bruntingthorpe Spit

Bruntingthorpe ? i though it did its ‘wheels up’ at Bagington(Coventry) ?

Phil

February 5, 2002 at 10:26 pm in reply to: A Rar(ish) bird these days #2115679

philo
Participant

RE: A Rar(ish) bird these days

And these ?
Attachments:

February 5, 2002 at 1:21 pm in reply to: Is this too close for warbirds ? #2115743

philo
Participant

RE: Is this too close for warbirds ?

Ok i Concede that it was taken with a big lens which as you quite rightly say tend to compress the depth. However if you think where the sun would have been on a mid July day at Duxford then look at the shadow cast by the Wildcat wing onto the Skyraider it infers little separation.
Dont get me wrong i’m not doubting the skill of the pilots involved, nor do i profess to be an expert on air flows between aircraft and where to position yourself in formation. I am just asking whether we feel that formations of mixed ( or otherwise) warbirds is the correct way to do things.

February 4, 2002 at 8:07 pm in reply to: Tough quiz #2115785

philo
Participant

RE: Tough Quiz

I’ve got all of the rest, its just that early triplane thats beating me at the moment. If you look closely you will note that it has one central engine driving the two props.

February 4, 2002 at 1:16 pm in reply to: PL865 the one legged Spitfire !! #2115888

philo
Participant

RE: PL865 the one legged Spitfire !!

ME !!!

February 3, 2002 at 9:39 pm in reply to: Angels One Five #2115932

philo
Participant

RE: Angels One Five

What an excellent film that is, John Griegson is ‘Septic’. I think it was shot very shortly after the war, so available aircraft wern’t really a problem.
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 554 total)

← 1 2 3 … 29 30 31 … 35 36 37 →