Thanks for the advice guys.
Tony – PM sent
I reckon that’s a positive ID – the clincher for me is the rounded corner on one side of the “bottom” (in fact, the top as fitted). Many, many thanks!
Just the second one to go now…….does the VS part number give any clues?
I also have the second Windscreen and have been trying to identify. It was aquired through a friend here in the USA. There is a part Number “VS-24815” printed at the top of the screen.
Would not “VS – 24815” equate to a Vickers Supermarine aircraft? If so, my thinking is along the Attacker or Swift line of enquiry.
For what help it may be, both screens came from a garden close to RAF Leuchars……
Nice selection there Jamie liking the Eastern jetstream
Regards
Peter
Nice pic – the chap in the left seat looks particularly handsome too!;)
It could be that they were just doing ILS/glideslope training and not actually landing on the runway, which would mean they would have no reason to have the landing gear down…the straight answer is I dont know for sure!
In terms of your other questions regarding the potential success of landing an aircraft without wheels, I am afraid I would not be able to help with those, sorry, but hope I have helped with the identifcation process…:D
To fly any profile accurately the aircraft must be fully configured, i.e. flaps and gear selected, otherwise annoying little thing’s like the GPWS starts shouting in your ear, gear warning horn etc., not to mention the safety aspect, so unlikely to be the 747 mentioned…..
Regarding wheels up landings – yes, possible and has been done on a fair few occassions and far less dramatic than you might think – assymetric gear is probably more risky IMHO
I would be cautious with some of the information contained in the book as most of it was never cross-referenced. Gordon was a nice chap but took things at face value and there are a few glaring inaccuracies contained in it, but for a long time it was the only book available on the subject and used the best of the information available at the time, bearing in mind it’s almost 20 years old. I think I have at least one spare copy should anyone else require one.
A much better read on Manx aviation would be “Rough Landing or Fatal Flight” by Steve Poole, which would have been available at the Manx Aviation & Military Museum (The Ronaldsway museum you refer to).
I too met him at a Mormon church at Bracknell -must have been ’86 too. He gave a very memorable chat talk about his wartime and post-war career – a talk that really helped encourage me in my own desire to fly. I also met him again in ’98 whe he came over with the C-54 and he nighstopped at Prestwick. I was doing my training at the time so I met up with him. Our digs were part of the former USAAF officers mess, where he’d billetted during the war! I was able to spend a whole evening just him and I yapping (well, him yapping, me hanging on his every word!). What disappointed me was that not one of my fellow aviation students was interested in meeting him.
Hadn’t considered rotary wing to be honest – thanks chaps. I take it the fact that the Gazelle didn’t generally carry armaments, the grip was still fitted out with the flip-over firing selector regardless or was it only certain marks?
A couple from a NASM trip in June.
There is a fine and distinct line between honouring and glorifying the deeds of men & women of war and honouring and glorifying war itself.
ATPL & commercial Captain. I don’t FS but I do like saving the world from the nazi hordes with CFS3 occasionally. 🙂
I have a couple of colleagues who are ardent FS “players”.
Quite simply stunning! I adore the Lysander and moon shot. I think it captures the very essence of the Lysander. As for the last Spit shot….my flabber is gasted!
Boring question Tim, which lens and setting did you use? (Still trying to practice in time for Legends with my 20D)
So I was a bit wide of the mark then! Are you familiar with the site and if so, how complete is the information?
It’s certainly the best Czech resource I’ve found yet.
It is actually located on the other side of the road, at the water treatment plant! Bit of a pain to get to actually – you have to go through Elsham village and along the old main road before you kind of stumble upon the treatment plant.
Shame you didn’t see the post a couple of weeks ago – I spent a few happy evenings in Barton (I was at the Reeds for 4 weeks)
Darren, I’m using an Epson Photo R300 (A4) printer. My previous printers have had that option but this one does not seem to – the “Reduce/Enlarge by output media” does not do the trick.
I’m conscious of not wishing to hijack the forum for photography questions but I’m only just starting to get more serious – hence the new camera. I’m going to invest in an A3 printer at some point as well as numerous other items but if someone can point me to a suitable forum for such amateurisgh questions I’d be grateful, meanwhile thanks for your patience and input one and all!
As I said Moggy, “Idiot’s terms”!
I think I have been misunderstanding the drop down menu – I assumed changing the pixel dimensions was the same as resolution – D’OH! 😮
I have used a sample picture to work on and I noticed that when I change resolution to 300dpi (it was at the default of 72), the image gets massive, but I then reduced just the size – as you suggested, it would indeed appear that Robert has become my mother’s brother.
I knew it would be simple! Just as an aside then, do I need to adjust the dpi before or after setting the size?