dark light

Mark V

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 961 through 975 (of 2,768 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Question re covers for aircraft. #1241088
    Mark V
    Participant

    I had 2 Canberra covers made by Cambria Covers

    Its actually Cambrai Covers! Here is a recent example of their excellent work.

    in reply to: Cosford Airshow this weekend #1170115
    Mark V
    Participant

    Where do you get your info then Mark?

    BBC weather – unless I dont like what they are saying. 😉
    Just looked at Metcheck – they predict 12 deg C and BBC predict 22 deg C – only a 10 degree disparity then!

    in reply to: Cosford Airshow this weekend #1170136
    Mark V
    Participant

    I’m hoping to attend, but the weather isn’t looking too good right now…

    But its looking quite good for the weekend: sunny intervals Saturday and Sunday, 22 degrees, 9mph wind (Telford area). Doesnt really get that much better in the UK :confused:

    in reply to: Hangar 11 Hurricane Progress #1170769
    Mark V
    Participant

    Replica!…from Hendon!!?…’Tisk’

    Anne (who has had a few more units of a very nice Shiraz/Cabernet Sauvignon than she should have)

    OK – RAF Stafford (BTW – Cheers 😀 ) Couldn’t have done it without you 🙂

    in reply to: Hangar 11 Hurricane Progress #1170949
    Mark V
    Participant

    You mean in the fact that they are the wrong colour????

    Ahem – its not actually painted yet :p

    in reply to: Hangar 11 Hurricane Progress #1171350
    Mark V
    Participant

    Any news about the covering, anyone?

    All done – the Hangar 11 Collection website has been updated yet again and also re-formatted to make it more ‘user friendly’. For the latest Hurri pictures showing the newly applied fabric see http://www.hangar11.co.uk/gallery.php?id=8

    in reply to: Fantastic colour photos from 1959 Miramar Airshow #1173114
    Mark V
    Participant

    Remarkable – strange how the shots of the ‘antique’ aircraft such as the F6F, Corsair etc could have been taken yestrday and all the then ‘modern’ hardware on show are the real gems, much since disappeared.

    in reply to: Southend Airshow #1174967
    Mark V
    Participant

    I was amazed to see a report on the airshow on both our Anglian TV News progs showing an attendance of 100,000 people and what appeared to be a pretty full flying programme, there was even blue sky during the Reds performance.
    I’m only 30 miles away but it never stopped raining here all day and night and continues to do so, coupled with extremely high winds.

    That 30 miles makes a big difference. The conditions were challenging yesterday but as you say many of the performers including the Reds, B-25 and Hangar 11 P-51 made it.

    in reply to: Spitfire IX /XVI #1176103
    Mark V
    Participant

    I think all the 16s had the cut down rear fuselage, but only some of the 9s had it.

    No – there were both low-back IX’s and high-back XVI’s manufactured, its just that far more low-back XVI’s survive today and its now viewed as a distinguishing feature.

    in reply to: Spitfire IX /XVI #1176603
    Mark V
    Participant

    As I understand it there is a difference in engine, one having the RR Merlin the other a Packard Merlin but what other differences were there please?

    None – apart from detailed systems directly associated with the different engines (particularly the inter-coolant system). The XVI was exclusivley built at Castle Bromwich.

    in reply to: Hurricane R4213 research help required #1179360
    Mark V
    Participant

    Thanks Mark V have tried this, to no avail –

    Sorry – what is it you tried? :confused:

    in reply to: New Paint For Yak-3 D-FJAK #1182632
    Mark V
    Participant

    Here are a couple of shots of the finished article!

    in reply to: New Paint For Yak-3 D-FJAK #1183106
    Mark V
    Participant

    Other than being historically accurate, what are the benefits and disadvantages of using fully matt paint? Looking forward to seeing this aeroplane.

    The advantage of it being authentic pretty much is the most important issue for us. However the paint is also there to protect the airframe, the matt paint we use will do this if correctly applied and it is of appropriate aersopace specification. To keep it looking clean the finish is best washed with a mix of water and aircraft shampoo/detergent (rather than polished). This matt finish is actually quite smooth and does not harbour grime as much as one might expect. Spitfires SM969 and AR213 were both painted this year with the same material.

    in reply to: Hangar 11 Hurricane Progress #1184272
    Mark V
    Participant

    I do have a question regarding the Hurricanes rear framework seen in the last two pictures. I have always been under the impression that the Hurricane was constructed of wood covered in fabric but the framework visible appears to be metal. Is this a modern touch to offer increased safety and a longer life to the airframe or a clever use of silver/grey paint?

    Well no – the original Hurricane rear fuselage design is a girder like (triangulated) construction of Dural and steel tubes braced with stainless steel flying wires. The wooden parts of the structure are the frames and stringers which give the fuselage its shape which are fixed to/around this structural frame. This is in turn is fabric covered to provide the external shape. The upper parts behind the cockpit (turtle deck) are made of an an all wood construction and the removable belly panels are also plywood, all fabric finished. The front cowling parts are all alloy constuction similar to a Spitfire. In short – there is a bit of everything! G-HHII is being restored precisely to original specification, apart from one or two small changes for safety such as modern radios.

    There is little you can do or would want to do to significanlty enhance the structural strength or longevity of a Hurricane airframe as its already very over engineered.

    in reply to: Hurricane R4213 research help required #1185037
    Mark V
    Participant

    Hi Seafuryadic,

    We have the code as LK-O,
    http://www.aircrewremembrancesociety.com/

    Hmm, 151 Squadron aircraft were coded DZ throughout WWII (LK was 87 Sqdn.). There are very few pictures available – I think we discovered only three or four when researching the Fighter Factory scheme (DZ-O) last year. Log-books of the period tend to mention only serials so tying up the code letter and serial number can be a bit challenging. A member on here was researching Polish Sergeant pilots a few years ago and was able to assist us (‘Gretza’).

Viewing 15 posts - 961 through 975 (of 2,768 total)