dark light

Ant.H

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 2,663 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Lancaster update! (long post..!) #1811984
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Hi AJ,
    Yep,I was confused about that aswell for a moment!I’m presuming Peter is referring in this post to FM159,which is currently under taxyable restoration at Nanton,Alberta. The other Lanc Peter posts about is FM212,currently(?) mounted on a plinth in Jackson Park,Windsor,Ontario.
    Have I got that right,Peter?

    http://www.lancastermuseum.ca/lancs.html#FM159

    in reply to: Duxford Ambassador G-ALZO #1812120
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Hi Ray,
    The majority of the work on the exterior of the Ambassador has been done,save for the final tarting up and the adding of the outer wings.The interior is recieving alot of attention at the moment,which perhaps explains why there hasn’t been much obvious progress in the last year or so.The aircraft is being restored by a small but dedicated team to a very fine standard indeed,we should give them the credit they deserve and also be more patient.As for whether the aircraft will fly again,that’s a definate no.DAS and the IWM don’t fly their aircraft,they’re purely exhibits.Couple this with the shortage of Ambassador spares and you’ve got yourself one truly ground-bound machine.
    To be honest,I’m just glad the machine is being restored at all,if it were anywhere else but Duxford it almost certainly wouldn’t be getting the treatment she’s getting now.The long term plan as I understand it,is to incorperate her into the AirSpace building/Superhangar once its renovation and extension is complete.You could argue that it’s a good thing restoration is taking so long-if it were complete already IWM might’ve been tempted to push it outside for the next few months!

    in reply to: Mid Atlantic Air Museum WWII Weekend #1812760
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Taken from the Hawker Hurricane Society survivors web-page…:)

    http://www.jacksonharrison.co.uk/BoB2/HurricaneSociety/hurricane_list.htm

    “RCAF5667
    Mk.XII
    Gerald Yagen, The Fighter Factory, Virginia USA
    Airworthy. S.O.C. 1 October 1946. Civil registration N2549. Formally owned by Niel Rose “

    in reply to: Matchbox 1/32 Spitfire F22/24 #1812850
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Oh christ,not this one!I’m afraid to say this is one of those kits I prefer to forget,it’s not the easiest to build or best fitting of kits.As I remember it,the interior details such as the engine,canon bays etc were a very poor fit,and the wing to fuselage join was over-complicated and very weak.
    That said,from what I remember it’s basically accurate in shape,and looks decent when it’s complete.Use plenty of re-enforcement on the wing/fuselage joint,and also be prepared to modify the undercarriage as the model doesn’t sit properly-it ends up looking like the gear is about to collapse.I’d also advise that you have plenty of filler to hand,as there are plenty of gaps.
    As for colour scheme,I’d say go for the 80Sqn one,IMHO it’s the best scheme the latter mark Spits ever wore.
    As for the example I built,it ended up in the bin after I botched up the paintjob,so I’m afraid I can’t post any photo’s of the finished model.What are the decals like with yours Daz?I remember the ones with mine were awful,they were the wrong colour and about a half an inch thick!

    in reply to: Mid Atlantic Air Museum WWII Weekend #1813496
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Great shots Eddie,thanks for sharing.It comes as a pleasant surprise to see Jerry Yagan’s Hurricane out and about,I didn’t realise she was airworthy again.The other shots are great too,the P38 looks particularly tasty (what P38 doesn’t??). 😎 🙂

    in reply to: Why Do We Shun Jets!!! #1813778
    Ant.H
    Participant

    I’m pleased to say that my interests seem to be quite broad.If it flies,it holds some level of interest for me,everything from wood and wire to fly-by-wire. Whilst it’s probably true that the modern stuff doesn’t have the same ‘character’,it’s still mighty impressive to watch an F16 being put through its paces.Whilst a classic jet might not have the same widespread appeal as a Warbird,they come a very close second for me. I went to the Military Pageant show at OW last summer,and the Gnat display that opened the show was an equal hilight alongside the Spit,Hurri,Gladiator etc.
    I think there’s also a blurred line between what’s modern and what’s classic,machines like the Canberra and T33 being still in service (albeit in ever-decreasing numbers),and even some of the more modern stuff like the Jaguar and Viggen are getting on a bit.I’ve never seen a Viggen fly,and I very much hope to see one before they are retired from service.

    in reply to: Photos of La Ferté Airshow (second one) #1814044
    Ant.H
    Participant

    I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s some sort of security measure.If all aircraft in the flypast are flown by the military,then they can be more certain that nobody on board has any ill intentions.Just a thought…

    in reply to: Typhoon Troubles #1815502
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Whilst it’s true the Sabre had problems with the valves,I don’t think it was the valve seats as the Sabre had sleeve-valves like a Bristol radial engine.It was apparently Bristol who used thier sleeve-valve expertise to cure the Sabre’s valve problems.As I said earlier,I don’t have the issue to hand,so can’t give any specific detail.Humbug! 🙁

    in reply to: Typhoon Troubles #1815540
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Yep,you’re right Denis.When the Tiffie first came into service there were a number of accidents where the aircraft were last seen spiralling lazily into the deck.It transpired that the pilots had been overcome by carbon monoxide exhaust fumes that had accumulated in the cockpit.It pretty quickly became standard practise for Typhoon pilots to put thier oxygen masks on even before start up,and they wouldn’t take them off again untill engine shut-down at the end of the mission.IIRC,there were still one or two cases where the pilots suffered carbon monoxide poisoning after their oxygen system failed or was put out of action.The Tiffie was a veritable flying gas chamber.

    in reply to: Typhoon Troubles #1816259
    Ant.H
    Participant

    The Database article in last month’s Aeroplane seems to suggest that the true cause was never found,despite various mods over the years.There was a time when they thought they’d cured it,but the accidents started happenning again after a time. Unfortunately,I don’t have the magazine to hand at the moment,so can’t quote from it directly.

    in reply to: Luton Spitfire Project? #1816436
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Aha!Cheers Mark12,that’s the one.I don’t remember it having wings,so that shot must be slightly later than the ones I saw.Is there any recent news on the project?

    in reply to: RNHF Sea Fury #1817248
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Great news,thanks Stringbag.Do you have any idea who’ll be performing the test flights? There can’t be that many current SeaFury drivers here in the UK,and IIRC,the only RNHF pilot to fly the aircraft when she was last active (Phil Shaw) has since retired.Is there a current RNHF pilot with SeaFury experience?

    in reply to: Photos of La Ferté Airshow (second one) #1817314
    Ant.H
    Participant

    Wow! Thanks Franck 😎

    in reply to: Southend – but from a different angle #1819496
    Ant.H
    Participant

    “Arm Waver,

    You are correct, minimum essential crew only in a display, so the Catalina pilot is certainly breaking the rules!!”

    What if the passenger is part of the aircraft’s support crew?I was under the impression that ground crew could be carried in the aircraft if it’s operating away from base.
    Excellent pics folks. 🙂

    in reply to: Heinkel 111 & Meschersmit 109 at Duxford #1819497
    Ant.H
    Participant

    The rear fuselage and one engine from Hess’ 110 are displayed in the upper galleries at IWM Lambeth.The other engine is displayed at the Museum of Flight at East Fortune.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,201 through 1,215 (of 2,663 total)