dark light

Chacko

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 200 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: INS Vikramaditya (ex-Gorshkov) #2060450
    Chacko
    Participant

    Well I certainly beleive its yet to be proven. NG has not performed the compatibility assesment. I must admit though for it to have the stage where the operator (IN) is contracting a study then it must look on paper at least to be doable. More power to the In if they can get E-2s on their CVs, its certainly a very capable aircraft. Not sure its really necessary though.

    Daniel

    I met the NG guys. They have already done the study and they found it as a fit. They inform me that IN too has come to the same conclusion. I am in touch with the top two guys who are negotiating with IN.

    in reply to: China not happy with J-10, now cloning F-16 #2660069
    Chacko
    Participant

    Its hearty to know that we have a lot of knowlwdgeble people on J-10 issue. Even if there is no official versions, people seem to be credible and sources like Kanwa is discredible.

    in reply to: Indian AF – News & Discussions – Jan 2005 #2660230
    Chacko
    Participant

    Tejas being integrated with weapon systems, multi-mode radar

    BANGALORE, FEB 3 (PTI)
    Work on weapon systems and integration of the multi-mode radar in Tejas, the home-grown Light Combat Aircraft has begun while three prototypes of the supersonic fighter have flown 340 test sorties.

    Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), the design agency for the LCA, a unit of DRDO, today said three Tejas aircraft have been flying upto an altitude of 15 km, speed of Mach 1 . 4 and angle of attack of 20 degrees and Gravity Pull (G) of over 4.5 to minus 1.0 G limits during test flights.

    “Tejas has so far completed over 187 hours of flight test in 340 flight test sorties on three prototype aircraft,” an ADA statement said.

    Gp Capt R K S Bhaduria, test pilot for ADA and National Flight Test Centre (NTFC) today completed his 100th flight test sortie on Tejas, becoming the second pilot after Sqn Ldr Suneet Krishna to fly 100 sorties of the LCA.

    Eight test pilots of the Indian Air Force have evaluated these aircraft, including Air Cmde R K Sharma, the present project director (Flight test).

    “The handling qualities as well as the performance of these aircraft have been adjudged superb,” ADA said.

    The fourth prototype (PV-2) is undergoing systems integration test prior to its clearance for flight.

    The single-engine, tailless, delta-winged, fly-by-wire supersonic fighter currently is powered by an American GE-404 engine. DRDO is developing an indigenous Kaveri engine for Tejas being designed to replace the aging MiG aircraft of the Indian Air Force from the next decade.

    in reply to: China not happy with J-10, now cloning F-16 #2660361
    Chacko
    Participant

    wind tunnel models can be used to gather intelligence to some extent..this is something I learned on this forums.

    Remember they also showed Rafale model…in wind tunnel..next thing we know:
    “ProtonRiver Reports that China is Copying Rafale”

    😀

    Proton River has already tied up with Aerospace and marine International. Its a bi monthly magazine. You might see protonriver moving ranks on credibility.

    in reply to: China not happy with J-10, now cloning F-16 #2660370
    Chacko
    Participant

    If J-10 has problems and Chinese still accept it, i was wondering about FC-1 aka JF-17. Chinese aren’t accepting that. Just a thought.

    in reply to: Indian AF – News & Discussions – Jan 2005 #2661022
    Chacko
    Participant

    Bah! Yindus! They were flying strange formations. Probably Yindus were in complete disarray as its unprofessionally trained force. One plane was flying straight because the yahudees taught it to yindus.

    it takes yankee genious to point out that it was a formation at all.
    Do I make sence? perhaphs as much as the article.

    in reply to: BrahMos thread – Part 2 #2050144
    Chacko
    Participant

    Thanks Austin.

    That MiG-29k must be photoshoped.

    in reply to: BrahMos thread – Part 2 #2050153
    Chacko
    Participant

    I just wished I had those qualities of singing and dancing in me 😉 , I just dont mind these missile sing loudly and dance all their way to their destination the USN Arleigh Burke class ships. :rolleyes:

    Brute would you care to share with me all the *confidential* *PS’ed* stuff you have on Bhramos 😉

    Mr. Nitin and Mr. Austin 😡 I know you are Indians and you claim to know everything. Let me warn you not to mess with me. I have proof.

    See this picture?
    http://www.deagel.com/img/lib/1h8210.jpg

    Indians phoshoped this image and added a MiG-21 intake in the front. :rolleyes: The intake is not even 3rd generation. 😀

    Austin, how come you have a western looking name? Is it photoshoped too?

    Anybody has approximate weight of air launched photoshoped Brahmos missile? Detail needed urgently.

    in reply to: BrahMos thread – Part 2 #2050170
    Chacko
    Participant

    Yakhont is a russian missile. Brahmos is MiG-21 with Yakhount Airframe. Its so simple. I have a radio that looks like coco cola bottle. You see the same principle.

    Most of the stuff i got is confidential. Someday i will share with you. 🙂

    in reply to: BrahMos thread – Part 2 #2050176
    Chacko
    Participant

    Speaking of converting a/c to missiles, MiG did have a piloted prototype version of their KS-1 Komet nuclear AsHM before conversion to the series production version.

    One way mission? Must be desperate times. But interesting possibilities.

    in reply to: BrahMos thread – Part 2 #2050179
    Chacko
    Participant

    Brute – if missile inlet looks like Mig-21 inlet doesnt mean anything. As long as it do what it is intended for Indians dont care.

    On what basis u are saying it will crash before taking off.

    Photoshop missile 😀 – good observation for a brute gorilla.

    Hey cinciboy! Ignore Harry. Afterall he is just an expert. You have terrific observation capacity. I have loads of information on photoshoped Brahmos. It will be usefull to exchange notes if you have any with you. You have no idea what these Indians photoshop and induct in their armed forces. I have too many facts. 😮

    See when Indian MiG-21 takes of with a pilot, it actually flies and then crashes. Imagine it is used as a missile, then there is no pilot, hence it will automatically crash. The Mig-21 inlet is 2nd generation inlet, right? How can it perform supersonic? 😡

    in reply to: BrahMos thread – Part 2 #2050185
    Chacko
    Participant

    How is the Brahmos a LO missile, as claimed by Indians? Look at the photos.

    The Brahmos is an old-fashioned design with a MiG-21 style nose intake.

    It is not even a modern missile design. How is it LO?

    You are right. Its a secret Indian project to convert old Mig-21 and make it look like a Russian missile. Its a photoshop missile. Commeon, how it can be lo. It will crash before taking off. Sheesh! These Indians 🙁

    in reply to: Indian AF – News & Discussions – Jan 2005 #2608324
    Chacko
    Participant
    in reply to: J10A HAS A NUMBER OF PROBLEMS IN DESIGN #2611219
    Chacko
    Participant

    …..

    Shows you that you don’t even know Russians designed their own aircraft.

    The MiG-19, MiG-21 and the MiG-23 have their gearbox set on the bottom. 😛

    Possible, let me check out on that

    KANWA is rehashing their own old articles. But anyone can see from the clumsy structural sleeves mounted on top of the intake to make their own similar conclusions

    When was the old article published as per your claim. AFIK, there was once similar news when wind tunnel testing but not from kanwa. We are also aware that Al-31 was chosen is the mid way of the J-10 project. kanwa report came after that (naturally!). So whic year rehash is it?

    in reply to: J10A HAS A NUMBER OF PROBLEMS IN DESIGN #2611264
    Chacko
    Participant

    Did it even occur to you that they were doing this simply so because that’s the way things have been for a long while? And that the Chinese have most of their experience with the configuration having the gearbox on the bottom, just like every fighter in the West?

    which western aircraft Chinese have experience on? All fighter aircrafts which China has is Russian which has gear box on the top. Chinese were forced to get a bottom configured engine as Lavi has it. The other thing is Chinese had the British Osprey engine. But bulk is Russian copies. So i beg to defer.

    Same rehash of the said article. That’s the same material in the J-10 problems article

    Rehash of which article? Its Kanwa which points out that J-10 has structural problems, so whose stuff is Kanwa rehashing?

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 200 total)