I can imagine what it would look like – ‘Pearl Harbor’ compared to ‘Tora Tora Tora’! Instead of real aircraft they had CGI’d Zeros and P-40s maneuvering around like a mach one arcade game.
Must pander to the kids nowadays though, and it would be bloody awful. Who would have guessed that were so many gays, ethnic minorities, and unmarried mothers flying those Spitfires and Hurricanes back in 1940?
Oops – I was going to include disabled people, but remembered Douglas Bader…
Interesting idea that homosexuality, ethnicity and marital problems did not exist in the 1940’s and that no such person with those would have taken part in the battle of Britain. You also managed to slight all people younger than yourself as if they are historical dullards.
Perhaps you should have a think about what you are about to type before you type it next time; its just that you come across as an ignorant bigot and i’m sure you wouldn’t want that to be how people see you.
I can’t add much except
I was there on det with another of the aircraft types on the pan.
2 amusing memories were watching a Nimrod taxi on to the pan infront of the assembled press, only for it to turn around infront of them creating a giant sandstorm that engulfed them all and generate huge cheers from the lineys! They bravely abandoned all their equipment and ran off to try and cough up all the sand out of their lungs! Sadly though half way through the turn the jet ran out of momentum, so the pilot opened the taps, which in turn allowed the jet blast to distribute the video cameras that had been abandoned into the desert at the side of the pan!
The second memory was watching a RAF MT driver pushing one back into it’s slot when he ran out of talent, sheared the towing arm and parked the tractor in the radome! Believe it grounded the jet for a week or two whilst a spare had to be ferried out from the UK!
Fantatstic, what a line up!!!
My Dad just saw that and said ‘oh yes, the flying s h i t e’, obviously a source of much amusement back in the day!
Just as a hijack but I’m after an Mi-2 tacho if anyone has got one!
Cheers
Matt
Maybe these masks are just worn to look more “period” (others would say “cool”) than with lowly David-Clark earwarmers… 😎
Bit like lugging a pilot’s suitcase with Jeppesens for all of Europe into the club C172 for a local ride, come to think of it…. :p
They are worn for comms, not easy to wear a headset and boom when pulling high G maneouvres! I bet you its bloody horrible though wearing one just for the comms and without a nice flow of oxygen!
Does anyone have any photographic evidence of the numbers/registrations that were said to be painted in the wheelwells of the Buchons during the Battle of Britain Film? Although there are published references to this and I have spoken to someone that remembers them being there, it’s not clear as to whether it was the G-AWH- registration, the C.4k- serial number or the builders construction number. They were also said to be applied in the flaps somewhere. A font style would be nice as well…;)
Oh, and whilst I’m on the subject, anyone know the identity of the Buchon that crashed fatally prior to the commencement of filming in Spain?
Cheers
Roobarb
I may be able to check this for you, Give me a couple of weeks
Cheers
Matt
Just as an example of looting progression over time, notice the similarities between the photo and typical looting damage as shown in these photos from’ Bodenplatte’ by John Manrho and Ron Putz. It is a very well done photo but I’m still sceptical all those little things seem strange
Also notice that there is usually someones buddy in the photo too!

Bit of info about Jg53 unit basings
hmmmm i think its been upside down then craned over onto its belly hence the damage behind the cockpit.
The body looks real enough but i suspect its the Russian front so probably not the original pilot, looks more like a Russian uniform to me.
Plenty of original WW2 shots look similar to this, fake but real and vise versa
I don’t agree at all, nothing suggests its been on its back, there is no spinner damage, unless it flipped over tail first.
it’s supposed to be the oil tank cowling, notice the lack of the rest of the cowlings though, they weigh alot and often lie near the aircraft but they are absent here
For the interested visit this site:
click on any version 109 you want to see at the side and then select a further version from the pull down menu that appears, then click S/w fotos.
Compare the belly landed 109’s with this photo
Photos of K-4’s and late war aircraft are rare, it’s not like allied stuff, the number of photos is low but there are alot of people interested in late war german aircraft and some have deep pockets, as I noted before an undiscovered oirignal good photo of a k-4 could fetch around the 1000 euro mark I have personally watched this happen on other german fighter photos and what may seem like a nice photo to alot is really a goldmine for some collectors and they are willing to pay, so faking is worth it, even the most basic of german stuff is faked today, stuff you couldn’t imagine why people would but they do!
Looking at the pilot again, it is just not possible for him to be sitting like that, he is well raised out of the cockpit, with the way the seat is it could not happen not to mention he has no way of sitting up right! So I think there is a general consensus the photo is staged but I’m not convinced it is real, lots of little things are odd, I still can’t see any wing bulges but a modeller would not be so stupid to leave them off, perhasp he has removed them to make it look like battle damage, only thing is they don’t just fall off, they are huge, thick and heavy and an integral part of the wing so where are they?
No sign of the PR16 aerial either??
Another big one being that only this one photo has appeared, again when lots of soldiers come through and do this sort of damage to aicraft you get a whole series of photos from different people that turn up but only this one has appeared.
I agree it isn’t a very ‘professional’ job. I thought it could be a Russian propaganda photo; I’m no expert but Russian propaganda tends to be cruder both in a technical sense and also in (what was acceptable) subject matter. I think also the Russians employed propaganda units at a more local level in the field such as producing ‘field newspapers’ at a divisional level.
I don’t know what it is about it but it reminds me of posed photographs of knocked-out tanks.
As has been suggested the stripping of the airframe for parts could have occurred after a simple belly-landing accident much in advance of the ‘combat’ damage (and without the body of the ‘pilot’ of course). Later on as the battle-lines change a propaganda unit finds the wreck and ‘dresses’ it suitably as a combat loss.
From the other point of view would a modeller, and a very good one at that, bother to create such a diorama at considerable time and expense just so that a single ‘fake’ photo could be produced and sold on eBay? Not likely is it?
You have underestimated the price single photos of rare things demand, We’re talking 1000+ euros! Seriously, it is worth the trouble.
The level of ‘disassembly’ By soldiers just isn’t coherent, it is in the more advanced stage of exploration by soldiers, breeches opened, cowls removed, access hatches opened, tail destroyed, but jerry left in the cockpit??? It is a modelers fantasy, this is the sort of damage seen after a few weeks or days after crashing and after troops have been through, there are good original photos showing this progression of damage, leaving a pilots body in the cockpit just doesn’t happen!
Unfortunately I know very little about markings and colouration, there are guys out there who know so much about this and can tell so much from a B&W photo it would make your head spin, they could tell you if it was real or not just by looking at the markings but alas it does not interest me too much.
*Edit* just to add it wouldn’t be a front band but a defence of the reich band, the welle makes it III Gruppe, perhaps JG53??
DOTR bands:
http://users.hol.gr/~nowi/luftdef/index.html
*edit again* Also look at the listing, typical of people selling fakes, pretend not to know what the item is to generate interest, can you imagine someone with a photo like this trying to sell it to make money legitimately describing it as such, do you not think they would not take the slightest bit of interest in what it was, especially someone who sells so many military items, come on it’s typical fake tactics, “oh I have no idea what this rare photo with a dead guy and a luftwaffe plane is of please take advantage of my ignorance and pay nothing for it”
More Discrepancies, looking at the hydraulic tank:
A) the lines are very straight like you see when a modeller uses wire to do tubes
B) and I think this is quite telling, on a real 109 hydraulic tank the two hydraulic line fittings that come out actually bend away from each other slightly, enough to be noticeable. Mr. Modeller has not done this and made them paralell.
I could of course be wrong and would like to be proved so, more photos of K-4’s would be great but I think technical accuracy has let this photo down. Very good though!
See below

