dark light

Augsburgeagle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 390 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: suspicious photo #1129136
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    I think it’s a model guys, look at the pilots arms they do not lie natural over the cockpit sides and his hands are to big and lacking any detail. They look to me to be “plastic looking”.

    Also the 109 is too sharp for a photo taken in WW2. I have taken pictures of models in the past and with a digital camera can get this effect quite easily.

    Regards

    Nic Jackson

    I don’t agree with the too sharp part, most WW2 german aircraft image are extremely good and sharp, it is odd for them to be of poor quality

    in reply to: suspicious photo #1129167
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    It’s a bit odd. The MG breeches are open indicating that people have been around it and been playing with it and messing with it, alot of damage occurs to belly landed 109’s afterwards in the hands of soldiers, so much of the tail damage could have happened after belly landing but if soldiers have been around the cockpit area and playing with the breeches I have a very hard time believing they would leave a body in the cockpit, no.1 he’s in the way of all the souveniers! It seems like a modeller would love to make a diorama like this but it’s not particulary believable.
    The tail wheel is down indicating that this k-4 had the tail wheel locked down as happened on many k-4’s but the tail wheel doors are open which seems strange, usually with retractable tail wheels locked down the doors are locked shut.
    Also where are the wing large tire fairings? These are made out of very substantial and thick metal and riveted on top of the existing wing with the cutout for the balloon tyres but there is no sign of it?
    How is the pilot sitting upright? His back should be held up by the cockpit bathtub that has apparently been blown away, also the MW tank is not damaged but that area has extreme damage? What’s he held up by (modelling glue!)
    Around the firewall I would expect to see the U/C selector and drop tank valve as it is light natural metal but there is no sign of it.
    Quite a few strange things really, I am not convinced, if anyone diasagrees with these observations the please say.
    Matt

    in reply to: Origins of the Merlin piston Ashtray? (Old thread) #1129416
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    Just as an interesting aside the germans also produced ashtray pistons, here a merlin piston ashtray is shown with a rare Jumo 222 piston
    Matt
    http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/7559/dsc4967j.jpg

    http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/5813/dsc4971.jpg

    in reply to: RAFM Cosford – 11Nov09 #1136797
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    it’s such a shame that the luftwaffe birds are in a neglegted state, they are such a far cry from how they should be and are living reminders of the ‘bad old days’. Maybe one day they will get the proper restoration they deserve

    in reply to: Round Blackpool Tower for 7/6 #1139304
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    35p! Does anyone know what the conversion to modern value is?

    in reply to: ME 262 Engines #1150353
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    Just another bit on DB engines,
    A czech maintainance engineer on the late DB’s wrote this:

    “don’t believe stories of communist sabotages invented by writers-the work was done thorougly untill the end of the war”

    Personally I believe perhaps some sabotage occured but I don’t think it was a huge problem; it seems poor workmanship, adverse working conditions and haste was the real culprit for alot of sabotage!

    in reply to: ME 262 Engines #1151336
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    I think in some cases sabotage was not needed to create an unfavourable situation for the germans. Just by the use of unskilled and slave labour and the rush to produce such massive numbers of aircraft the general quality of production dropped, how the drop in quality affected serviceability I cannot comment on; however In Guido de Maeseneers book on Peenemunde he comments on the number of V2s that had to be returned as soon as they arrived just due to the bad quality of work and sometimes just due to the deterioation of the v2’s from sitting on the rail cars in the rain! Jerry Crandalls book on the D9 comments on how the late war plywood flaps of the D9 were even damaged by a rain storm in which 40 sets had to be replaced due to them having warped! Hans Dortenmann also notes how he prefered the superior quality of his early production D9 in comparison to the poor quality of the later D9’s but he did note how reliable his jumo 213 in his aircraft was.
    Here is a bit of info taken straight from the Japo K-4 book:

    “Defects caused by construction were accompanied with defects caused by hasty and low quality production”

    -elevator clearance in operating rod bearing
    -loose backlash elimination pieces in mechanism of elevator adjustment
    -missing direction marks on gearing rotation
    -clogged respective leaking mw system
    -faults in electrical wiring
    -improper ration of coolant components (almost always not enough glycol)
    -lose or mis-screwed sparkplugs
    -faulty gun adjustment
    -MK108 defects”

    it then lists DB605 defects and covers various issues with the k-4 due to hasty building and poor worksmanship but does not mention sabotage.
    Matt

    in reply to: Collection of Bristol Beaufighter Films from WW II #1153661
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    Much Better quality can be found on the British pathe website rather than youtube.
    Matt

    in reply to: Duxford Bimble No46 – 24Oct09 #1158960
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    what is the gen on the casa? is it being restored as a spanish machine or as pseudo luftwaffe? The Ju52 with the 801 in front of it is most impressive at duxford, would love to have spent more time looking at it!

    in reply to: Bournemouth (Hurn) 737s etc. #450813
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    Wot no CTC?

    in reply to: OTT Aircraft … #457295
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    Great shots, nice to see the aircraft hard at work earning their keep!
    Questions in 3 and 4 are the central contrails the apu’s running?
    Matt

    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    The collectors guild occasionaly have pieces come up for sale. There are much more interesting bits of luftwaffe aircraft to be had than cut up bits of hakenkreuz and for much cheaper prices too!

    in reply to: Bf109E snap-fit cowling latch? #1162501
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    One last one, As I said I’ll photo the ones in my collection next week but hopefully this is enough to get you started

    http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/2112/413v.jpg

    in reply to: Bf109E snap-fit cowling latch? #1162506
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    Here are some more shots I found on my laptop, these are all my photos.
    The latch is very clever like all fasteners found on luftwaffe aircraft. In the bottom photo you can see we have the steel insert on the main body of the fastner, the main cast body and the the top cast piece. On the middle photo you can see the bracket it locates into, it is a steel pipe with formed and welded on parts. It is probably easier for you to look at the pictures and see how it works than me explain it. I think there is enough to go on here to make it apparent.
    Personally I think these fastners are very effective, I remember looking round a hurricane for the first time and being astounded by the millions of dzus fastners used to hold simple covers on. These fastners do how get tired after alot of use and require replacement. I would be interested to know how they compared dzus fastners in combat. One or two well placed hits might make the cowling escape fairly easily but then again if you are receiving hits in that area you probably have more to worry about than a loose cowling!
    I also remember looking round a post war yak (I think it was anyway) and I swear I saw this style of fastner on it as well as the normal wartungs deckel style push button cover. I also noticed that on my brothers gtd350 engine the oil cap is an exact replica of the german from the war!

    *Edit* Whats piqued your interest in these peter?

    http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/5772/429x.jpg

    http://img151.imageshack.us/img151/6223/431o.jpg

    http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/9642/450f.jpg

    in reply to: Bf109E snap-fit cowling latch? #1162680
    Augsburgeagle
    Participant

    Hi peter,
    I will take some photos next week when I’m back home, The small locking insert is stamped steel body is cast.
    Matt

    Here is one shot I have, photo credit david weiss. The anchor block at the top is milled if I remember correctly.

    http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/6717/dsc0095a.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 390 total)