The Doctor Who 50th anniversary episode was very good and I suspect its success is quite embarrassing to the anti-BBC brigade. :highly_amused:
It wasn’t bad, but I found it difficult to follow at times. Why do the story lines have to be so complicated ?
My favourite episodes over the last few years have to be “Girl in the fireplace” and “click” both brilliant IMO.
Flying at 58100 feet and talking to Swanwick Military Radar.
U-2S/2219527/L/
Flying at 58100 feet and talking to Swanwick Military Radar.
U-2S/2219527/L/
What’s age got to do with it Alan?.As long as one enjoys it, that’s all that matters.
I meant not understanding the story lines.
What’s age got to do with it Alan?.As long as one enjoys it, that’s all that matters.
I meant not understanding the story lines.
The subject of Dr Who Hype came up on Newswatch. As I’ts been on every news bulletin, and chat show for the last couple of weeks.
I always watch the programmes, but am often left wondering what I have seen. Some of the stories are so complicated.
Or is it me just showing my age ? 🙁
I still remember watching the very first episode, which was actually repeated the following week, along with episode two.
It was either preceded by, or followed by Juke Box Jury.
The subject of Dr Who Hype came up on Newswatch. As I’ts been on every news bulletin, and chat show for the last couple of weeks.
I always watch the programmes, but am often left wondering what I have seen. Some of the stories are so complicated.
Or is it me just showing my age ? 🙁
I still remember watching the very first episode, which was actually repeated the following week, along with episode two.
It was either preceded by, or followed by Juke Box Jury.
I hope they manage to get the aircraft where it belongs…… Up in the air.
Yes indeed – well publicised here yesterday. As a great fan of Python I am wary of all reunions. They rarely live up to expectations and often never as good as the originals……..
I agree, not all comedy ages well. Even at the time, some of the Python sketches were over long, and not that funny.
Loved the films though.
I used to love Fawlty Towers, but watching some of the re-runs makes me cringe in embarrassment.
Yes indeed – well publicised here yesterday. As a great fan of Python I am wary of all reunions. They rarely live up to expectations and often never as good as the originals……..
I agree, not all comedy ages well. Even at the time, some of the Python sketches were over long, and not that funny.
Loved the films though.
I used to love Fawlty Towers, but watching some of the re-runs makes me cringe in embarrassment.
Thirdly that penny on fuel duty would not be hypothecated so you wouldn’t know how it was being spent, as some of us have argued above.
As well as costing more to collect, than any charity ever got to see.
Thirdly that penny on fuel duty would not be hypothecated so you wouldn’t know how it was being spent, as some of us have argued above.
As well as costing more to collect, than any charity ever got to see.
Just re-watching Cold War Jets loving the shots of Minis and Standard Vanguards parked under V-bombers! Can’t believe they’re from the same era!
Also XM603 looks very sad still!
Yes, I thought they could have picked a better example to show what a Vulcan looks like.
Why would you actually want to recover it. Everyone knows what a P-38 looks like. You can’t restore it, it’s just more Ali scrap as far as I’m concerned.
I tend to be of the same opinion. Unless this wreck is historically significant in some way, leave it where it is.
As others have said, recovering it would be the easy bit.
Is your objection the extra penny or the suggestion to give it to Children-in-Need?
I don’t give anything where the BBC is involved. I object to celebrities with six figure salaries, (paid by us), telling us to dig deep.
During the course of the year I attend about 20 meetings and dinners where an awful lot is raised by ordinary people for charity.
My wife is always sending off cheques to Scope. So between the two of us we donate a lot.