dark light

Flat 12×2

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 441 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: B-17's used in the film "The War Lover" ! #1418230
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    Pics. of N5232V at Gatwick on arivale in the UK.
    B17 at Gatwick
    + the next 2 pics. on Airliners.net of the same plane

    in reply to: B-17's used in the film "The War Lover" ! #1418378
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    ……. Just as an aside the low flying sequence where Steve McQueen buzzes the airfield was actually done, not a camera trick – now that is flying.

    As in this pic. on an RAF Bovingdon page
    Low flying B-17

    in reply to: If you enjoyed Top Gun.. #1366716
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    Thanks for that Mark, great suff, I’m sure most on hear will enjoy it.

    in reply to: B-26 in Essex #1368313
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    , there is the awesome example called Flak Bait at the Smithsonian in Washington – whats great is the whole plane is in here original chipped , worn and faded paint scheme – truly awesome

    With 202 combat missions !!! to her credit, even ‘truly awesome’ is an understatment.
    I’m glad to hear she is still ‘tatty’ & not in new factory fresh paint (restored).

    in reply to: Mosquito project for sale? #1373054
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    – there are 3 B35’s in Canada, and none of them fit the bill.

    Bruce

    Bruce
    Maybe 4 ? TA661/CF-HMR , RS700/CF-HMS , VP189/CF-HMQ , VR796/CF-HML

    in reply to: A puzzling Hurricane photograph. #1389895
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    [QUOTE=So I would say that your pic. was the right way round as first posted

    Hi. Sorry but the first pic is definitly the wrong way round.
    Phil :)[/QUOTE]

    Hi Phil
    I could well be wrong, if so why ?

    in reply to: A puzzling Hurricane photograph. #1389902
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    Just supposing the photo has not been reverse printed. Could this be a Gladiator propeller fitted to the Hurricane perhaps for ground training?

    Mark

    Mark
    Looking very closely, trying to decide which way round the pic. is , there appears to be no pilots ‘hatch’ as fitted on the starboard side, also there could be (just visible ?) a ‘sprung step up panel’ (if that’s what it is) halfway between the canopy & the wing, which would be on the port side.
    So I would say that your pic. was the right way round as first posted

    in reply to: Sea Furies to Reno #1392714
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    Steve
    Couldn’t find any rear seat ballast ? 😀 😀 😀
    Cleaner/polisher/photographer/gofer, also suitable as rear seat ballast available.
    Lots of taildragging experience in low performance warbird, err.. …. ok trainer 🙂

    P.S. great pics, PLEASE keep them coming, I’ll never tire of them

    in reply to: A puzzling Hurricane photograph. #1392779
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    No standard camouflage, single colour on Hurri ? Rudder coloured, guns well used but now covered in upper colour.
    Hudson after Mar ’41,start of lease lend serials (EAxxx)

    in reply to: FANTASY WARBIRD RACING LEAGUE #1393271
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    Jumo 222A-3 engine with a take-off rating of 3,000hp……. 😀

    Would be quicker with a production Sabre VII, 3,500 BHP (+ a test engine at 4,000 BHP) 🙂

    in reply to: FANTASY WARBIRD RACING LEAGUE #1393310
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    Sabre power Fury
    or Napier’s own racer with a Sabre, did it ever fly, IIRC maybe a few times from Heston ( was it called the Heston Racer ?)
    Any way, the Sabre was the most powerful production engine(Hp per CC) so should power any of the aircraft mentioned in this thread 🙂

    in reply to: Christmas shopping, FlyPast style #1406439
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    I sometimes buy a copy of ‘Motorsport’, the classic racing car magazine, and always go first to the huge classified section to imagine spending hypothetical :rolleyes: thousands!

    You & me to 🙂

    in reply to: History of a chippie needed #1413764
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    Try Rod Brown through his web site , he seems to know most things chippy
    http://www.chipmunkflyer.co.uk

    in reply to: Sunderland Photo #1426013
    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    Great photo – and that’s no small facility – I note a second Sunderland behind the first.

    And a 3rd ! so its even bigger than you thought !

    Flat 12×2
    Participant

    RAF Acklington armaments camp station hack, aprox. ’48

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 441 total)