Thanks Neilly….. and well done for avoiding the flash bounce off that gloss paint :rolleyes:
Trumper, I think you may be right.
This is not something that you see today, at least not at the larger shows in the UK.
The close up and fenceless experience can still be had in the US though. If you attend Airventure (Oshkosh) you would be very pleasantly surprised to find that there are no barriers of any kind. There is a white line on the grass to sit behind when the show is on but in the aircraft parking areas there are no barriers at all. The only rule is that you do not touch the aircraft. When start ups and taxiing occur visitors are asked to stay at a safe distance and the line crew people make sure nobody wanders across the path of a moving aircraft or gets too near the prop. Apart from that it is a much more relaxed and inclusive experience than say Duxford.
Yes Tom, they look better cared for than certain airframes here.
No – but I will keep a lookout for containers leaving the field on trucks!
Yep – Daz is spot on with those.
Looks like Spitfire XVI RW382 in the background too.
Good luck David, the Hornet was a truly awesome machine. The prototype had a top speed of 491mph and a range well in excess of 1000 miles. Just reading the Warpaint volume on the Hornet at the moment and amazed at the complexity of the composite structure.
Correct – something for 2004 🙂
Yes, they are nothing more than scale replicas with names poached from illustrius forebears.
Do these replicas have a control column or a yolk?
“swamped with eng”
Surely he means “swamped with egg”! 😀
Absolutely brilliant !! Thanks for the tip off.
Its possible. But as I understand it you would need to go through a company with a CAA A8-20 E4 (design approval) as only such a company can apply to the CAA for a Permit to Fly for the finished aircraft. This only applies to ex military a/c over 2,730 Kg all up weight and includes most of the fighter types such as Hurricane Spitfire P-51 etc.
Any company taking on responsibility for work done by another unapproved company or individual, with no way of checking the source of materials etc, would probably insist on re-doing much of it. That would make it rather expensive.
Obviously not then. Maybe someone has plans to go tomorrow?
Ant, the absence of ‘historical’ paperwork would not prevent this aircraft flying after restoration in the UK but any deviations from the original design amounting to ‘major modifications’ might cause problems. This is why certain aircraft restored overseas and operated over here depart our shores after a relativley short time. Our CAA does require a very detailed ‘paperwork trail’ with regard to the work undertaken in the re-build of a historic aircraft.